Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 371 |
|
Valued Member
Canada
122 Posts |
i dident know what forum to put this in. either in grading or varieties, but I think it fits in grading a bit more.   Edited by 2rtgah678 05/24/2022 12:15 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
19688 Posts |
To my eye, this coin appears to be a standard 1962 proof cameo Half. Field polish appears to be a little under done. This is probably explained by the large numbers of proofs of this date that were produced. Coin looks to be in otherwise pristine condition. 
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6454 Posts |
I have cameo proofs I would call deep cameo but I'm not a grader. I would say you have a shot at deep cameo. Here is my 1962 pr 67 cameo for comparison  
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
45146 Posts |
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
68947 Posts |
I wouldn't argue with deep cameo.
|
Moderator

United States
113522 Posts |
A nice cameo example! 
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
17462 Posts |
Looks deep cameo to me . Nice proof coin . 
In Memory of Butch L. and Jim U. rest in peace .
|
Valued Member
United States
118 Posts |
Cameo, but I guess it has a shot at deep cameo. Great coin!
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12217 Posts |
tough call on level of CAM without depth of field comparison but to me it looks DCAM. Maybe up to PF66
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
45146 Posts |
If I remember right,there is a -proof a proof and a + proof for each level of proof. Example proof 65 cameo - proof 65 cameo proof 65 cameo + Hope that makes sense. John1 
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1176 Posts |
Based on the photos, I'd say it makes dcam.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4648 Posts |
Certainly looks DCAM in the photos.
|
|
Replies: 11 / Views: 371 |
|