Posted 03/12/2019 11:11 pm
Quote:
how they feel about the spots that were NOT there when received back from paying to have coins graded or checked out for perfect coins, only to find a year later about the spots that are there now.
how they feel about the spots that were NOT there when received back from paying to have coins graded or checked out for perfect coins, only to find a year later about the spots that are there now.
You mean the ones caused by the mint? Very frustrating and it would be nice it the mints of the world could figure out the issue.
Quote:
To say that a percentage of some coins being affected by the lack of fully protecting any person's coins, is a complete failure of the profession, they represent.
To say that a percentage of some coins being affected by the lack of fully protecting any person's coins, is a complete failure of the profession, they represent.
Show me a single thing that's perfect by humans. Space shuttles crashed and they had the full backing of the federal government and 100s of billions of dollars put into their programs over the years. Everything has a defect/error rate, EVERYTHING.
Quote:
The simple fact that the third party graders could prevent and make the results a 100% avoidable policy by taking these steps, not a far stretch to ask of from the same people who are paying to see if their coins are PERFECT.........
The simple fact that the third party graders could prevent and make the results a 100% avoidable policy by taking these steps, not a far stretch to ask of from the same people who are paying to see if their coins are PERFECT.........
False. First of all again EVERYTHING has a defect/error rate there is no such thing as a 100 percent rate besides death.
Also as I already stated they would absolutely increase the amount of dust and lint on the coins and dropping incidents so the "solution" to something that isn't even a problem in the first place you glove/mask guys are proposing would actually increase the incident rate.
Quote:
Sounds like people need to have more of an open mind in Our discussions, I mean, We are on a coin collecting forum, seeking advice by some, more experienced collectors for some to do things correctly............ NO?
Sounds like people need to have more of an open mind in Our discussions, I mean, We are on a coin collecting forum, seeking advice by some, more experienced collectors for some to do things correctly............ NO?
Yes we are, which is why I am stressing the FACTS of the matter no matter how a couple people may feel. Open minds are for a matter of opinions like which eagle is the most beautiful or what was the best series ever made.
For black and white issues like this having an open mind for the sake of having an open mind does no one any good. As I said if some of you want to do it that way by all means knock yourselves out, but people who aren't doing it are not doing anything wrong or any harm to the coins. That is the part you guys are missing just because you think that it's doing some extra protection that it's not and are blaming TPGs for spotting that is a problem from the mint
My 2nd order came yesterday and the cent looks great; just like the first one. I was worried at first but once I jiggled the coin to a 'nice' place of the package it looked like another MS-70.
