Author |
Replies: 6,639 / Views: 270,884 |
|
Moderator

United States
23687 Posts |
My vote is for it to count for this year. His rule was 3/4 in 1486 AD and presumably the die cutters took a few weeks to prepare the dies once he ascended. I'm interested to see what others think.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
Pillar of the Community

Sweden
1073 Posts |
Let it count. The coin is datable to a time span less than one year long, and most of that time span is within 1486.
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
3934 Posts |
I'm the one who originally pointed out that it should probably qualify [for reasons essentially equivalent to @erafjel's wording], so obviously I also agree.
(It looks like we're 4 to 0 in favor so far, not counting @tdziemia.)
Edited by january1may 05/22/2022 1:44 pm
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
3952 Posts |
I say move on, as soon as @tdz has coin in hand
|
Valued Member
251 Posts |
I also vote for moving on. the dies preparation shall take time....
Anyway it is much better to move then to close the thread or to wait for another half a year untill somebody can find dated coin...
|
Moderator

United States
113452 Posts |
The Ayes have it. Motion passes. Moving on to 1485! Topic title updated. Lets get this train rolling again. 
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
5423 Posts |
Quote: I say move on, as soon as @tdz has coin in hand Because of the Italian antiquities law and export paperwork, I will probably not have it in hand until August. But, as it is paid for, I now own it.
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
3952 Posts |
Quote: Because of the Italian antiquities law and export paperwork, I will probably not have it in hand until August. But, as it is paid for, I now own it. There was never a doubt in my mind. Quote: Lets get this train rolling again. 
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
5423 Posts |
This undated 2 stjiver (double patard) of Burgundian Netherlands, Duchy of Brabant was struck in 1485. G.H. 61-1 and Numista #98735.  
|
Moderator

United States
23687 Posts |
Nice one @tdz! Here is a Half Stuiver from the Netherlands City State of Nijmegen dated AD 1485:  
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
Moderator

United States
113452 Posts |
Looking good!  We are moving again! 
|
Pillar of the Community
New Zealand
3942 Posts |
I can't see any dates, can people posting these coins please indicate where the date is and whether there are figures not recognisable to today's eyes like that weird looking 4 that looks like a loop etc.
I mean we are in the era of heart shaped shields, castles, maidens and medieval knights.
Loving Halfcrowns. British and Commonwealth coins 1750 - 1950 and anything Kiwi. If it's round, shiny and silvery I will love it.
|
Moderator

United States
23687 Posts |
No hearts on my coin, but there are rosettes. The reverse inscription has the date in Latin and Roman numerals:
ANNO DOMI' MCCCC LXXXV
For the foreseeable future, all of my posts in this thread will have this same date format, but I'll be sure to point out any oddities of form.
If you examine the M letterforms on this coin, you will see that they are all but one of the type with "swoopy" arms, but the M of DOMI is blocky. I don't have a good reason for this, but would be very glad to have someone educate me. I guess as some letters and numbers were in transition, it would not be unheard of for a die cutter to use the "old" letterform as well as the "new" one.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
5423 Posts |
Here is an undated grosso of the Florentine Republic struck in the first half of 1484, MIR 64/2. The mintmaster's symbol in the crook of Saint John's upraised arm reverse, is that of Gerozio di Cambio di Vieri Medici which can be used to date the coin. .  
Edited by tdziemia 05/26/2022 9:53 pm
|
Moderator

United States
113452 Posts |
I have removed the topic title alert. I will put it back if we get stuck again. 
|
Replies: 6,639 / Views: 270,884 |
|