Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 459 |
|
Valued Member
United States
65 Posts |
Edited by Matthew23 03/03/2021 10:58 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community

United States
56122 Posts |
I don't see a 66 at the major TPGs on this, but I'd like to see larger pics.
Edited by Coinfrog 03/03/2021 10:27 pm
|
Pillar of the Community

United States
2223 Posts |
Fields look clean, tough to judge obverse with that flashback. Cheek may hold it to a 65, shot at 66.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5451 Posts |
Several small but noticeable hits on the cheek and neck. Seems like a solid 66 would require fewer marks in this prime focal area.
|
Valued Member
United States
65 Posts |
This one got a 66+ with a cac sticker and has marks on the cheek looks almost the same as mine.  
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1043 Posts |
Larger photos would help.
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
I would not buy either of those examples as 66s. They are both strong 65s. This would be an example to me of buy the coin and not the holder/CAC sticker.
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
22024 Posts |
I agree with strong MS-65, not seeing a 66 though.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9965 Posts |
solid strike typical for this year. surface preservation is excellent which minor marks. luster not dripping but overall looks good. nice eye appeal. MS66 sounds right.
Edited by panzaldi 03/05/2021 11:42 am
|
Valued Member
United States
65 Posts |
The ms66 cac sold for ms66 money and more
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5451 Posts |
The contact marks on the PCGS coin are significantly less obtrusive than those on the ANACS coin. IMO, the ANACS coin should definitely grade lower than the PCGS example.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9658 Posts |
TPG grades are nothing more than opinions. If you don't agree with the opinion don't buy it. It pays to be fussy...
1883-O Nut
|
Valued Member
United States
65 Posts |
I paid $125 for it but if I had to sell it I wouldn't sell it for that
|
|
Replies: 12 / Views: 459 |
|