Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our Youtube Channel! Check out our Twitter! Check out our Pinterest!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

1981 Lincoln Penny, Reverse Errors? Assist Please.

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 320Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
65 Posts
 Posted 03/28/2021  10:49 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add RedMP1972 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Can someone assist me with what is going on on the reverse of this penny. Numerous letters on the reverse are over other letters that have been struck at a different angle. Help?



Edited by RedMP1972
03/29/2021 01:11 am
Bedrock of the Community
United States
39414 Posts
 Posted 03/29/2021  04:32 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like DDD, a worn die.
John1
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion )
Searched 5+ Million Cents Since 1971
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
2979 Posts
 Posted 03/29/2021  08:19 am  Show Profile   Check Yokozuna's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Yokozuna to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
it may also be from an over polished die.
"Shine, shine a Roosevelt dime. All the way to Baltimore and runnin' out of time." Tom Waits-Clap Hands



Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
United States
51647 Posts
 Posted 03/29/2021  09:20 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Remember what die flow looks like on the fields? That is the flowing lines around the devices. The lines of die wear on the multi-hub die creation of the past. The following of metal of the continuous metal of rearranging from the hundreds of thousands of coins, it has already struck. Wrinkles to an aging senior die. These look different than the DDD we see on the single squeeze dies. Why? the profiles are different. The older devices we tall, the single squeeze are lower. The devices wear differently. On the older dies, the die wear shows on the outside edge of the sides of the devices. Loosing first there, because they are taller. On the single squeeze dies, because the are a lower profile, showing die wear ( DDD) on the fields. Thus we see less lines between the devices. They still happen, but are not as tall as they are on the older style, of higher profile devices. That is the lines we are seeing on this coin. While it looks like devices/previously struck devices, it is a worn die issue, not a double struck issue. If it was a previous strike issue, why is only this area affected? It is a win die issue instead. Hope this helps in your getting to know the differences between the differences of the previous die creations, and the now single squeeze dies.
Richard S. Cooper
Some have asked about my images I use and I'm glad to say, you can now you can see the DVD in sections on youtube:
1. Intro, older coins, toned coins 2. Doubled dies 3. Die events, One of a kind errors 4. So called errors, Coin information 5. Coin information Types and Varieties, Overlays
Jefferson nickel doubled dies Wexler/Rebar complete listings

trail dies:http://www.traildies.com/
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 320Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.





Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2021 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2021 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to rattle this change. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05