Author |
Replies: 38 / Views: 4,216 |
|
Valued Member
United States
71 Posts |
Quote: Another questions from a newbie like me is if details matter much? Here is a 2x image of Year of Dog coin, lots of details, does it matter to coin people? Maybe you are new to coin collection, but your photo skills are those of an expert. People take coin pictures for different purposes, for presentation/enjoyment, for sale, for finding out varieties, for identifying fakes, for studying minting technologies, etc. Details are crucially important in some of these areas. You can visit vamworld.com to check out the pictures of various Morgan/Peace dollar varieties. There details are the key.
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5339 Posts |
I agree, your images are outstanding. Getting a tack sharp image is always important, but for some purposes, like selling coins for example, focus stacking is probably overkill. For uncirculated coins, getting an accurate depiction of luster, color, and brightness are just as important.
|
Valued Member
 United States
62 Posts |
thanks coinphotofan and Zurie, yes, I am "brand new" though coin collection was a hobby when I was a kid, but it never became real thing. It is tough to get luster image via focus stacking, I will find a new lighting method for that. Sure, color accuracy is very important, I think I need a calibrated monitor, just to view it. Currently, even my two monitors do not agree on color 
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3935 Posts |
Luster depends mostly on lighting. Typically, having lights at 45-60 degree angle vs horizontal will produce the best luster. Above 60 degrees luster starts to diminish, and of course at 90-deg (ie axial) it is completely gone as we've been discussing. I prefer high angle lighting as it brings the colors out on toned coins, so I usually have to find an angle that is a compromise between showing color and luster, and this is usually 75-80 degrees.
I wouldn't worry about monitor calibration. Just make sure your colors are accurate with proper white balancing. You never know who will view the image or the quality of their monitor, so best is just to make the image technically accurate.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
Valued Member
 United States
62 Posts |
thanks rmpsrpms, but I do think I need a calibrated monitor as I use all kind of lights and being able to match what is on my monitor to real thing is important.
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3935 Posts |
Problem is, if you start adjusting color to try and match what you see in-hand, you run into a few problems. First, very few monitors can be calibrated well, so you will only be able to get within a certain accuracy window. Second, even if your monitor is perfectly calibrated, human visual memory is not particularly good. To compare color, you must view in exactly the same lighting as you took the photo, and then compare that to what you see on the monitor. The accuracy of this process is not very high. And finally, if you go messing around with color, and assuming you did an accurate white balance, you are actually making the color inaccurate according to the factors mentioned above. Most accurate is objective white balance, and if you shift away from that due to perception of color on your monitor, it is guaranteed to be wrong.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
Valued Member
 United States
62 Posts |
oh, I am not saying WB is not important, what I am saying, WB will get you there but with calibrated monitor, it gets you there even better (to match clients' expection). There are people who are very sensitive to color tones, there are published color tone booklets. Even me, not a colorist, I sometimes have trouble with which editing I should use -- my two monitors shows slightly different color/contrast. Having a calibrated monitor, I think I can put a tone booklet on the monitor and compare.
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3935 Posts |
I am not disagreeing that having a calibrated monitor is a good thing. What I am saying is if you adjust your images based on your calibrated monitor, you are skewing the color away from reality, assuming you did a decent job of white balancing. When your client gets the image, it won't be as accurate as if you just used white balance, and if her monitor is not calibrated, with worst case a shift in opposite direction of your adjustments, the color may appear way off.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Replies: 38 / Views: 4,216 |