Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 769 |
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2283 Posts |
Maybe, but your photos are angle which do not reflect the real things.
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
The larger close pictures are from toe microscope
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2283 Posts |
The microscope is good, but when we go to much show complete others things then we look in collecting coins. An 100x I suggest to be the maximum. On some devices is hard to know but is just try to find the best. Photos for coins it is not a simple job I recognize, not your fault on. You see very well but not us, I made same thing in the begin.
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
44614 Posts |
Please no photos of your scopes monitor screen please...thanks. Also not so many photos per thread. And I am kinda sure they would be called varieties not errors. John1 
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
Valued Member
United States
295 Posts |
 Yep. Need better pics.
|
Valued Member
United States
295 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8026 Posts |
While all this gets sorted out, I'm thinking Die Deterioration may be working its magic.
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8370 Posts |
More photos of the same thing don't help. I am seeing a great deal of glare in your lighting. Try using a defused lighting source. 
ça va bien aller
|
Valued Member
United States
376 Posts |
Digital microscope, not optical, yes? Also, you have the lighting above coin. I aske because bouncing of light from the inside part of the rim is causing a possible reflection of the devices caught by the digital rendition of a real world image. Thoughts?
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
I don't know why it's giving such low quality pictures. I tried inside and outside. I will try again when I get home and cross my fingers there will b more clear. I have not had this problem before
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
The batch before this I was told or just the same as the prior, yet I took them outside with no light except natural with no microscope. I darkened 2 levels in the edit to help c detail..These coins alone are extremely shiny being they're out of a uncirculated roll
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8370 Posts |
I'll repeat what I already said... more of the same photos do not help! Your dime has a good deal of contact marks for being from an "uncirculated roll." Still too much glare. And please, no more screen shots as they are way tooo pixelated. 
ça va bien aller
|
Valued Member
United States
116 Posts |
I've tried taking pictures inside under no light inside, outside..and camera I guess is just not suitable for this unfortunately. What do you take your pictures with? I obviously will b moving on from this coin due to not having the equipment adequate for this discussion
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 769 |
|