Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our Youtube Channel! Check out our Twitter! Check out our Pinterest!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

1891 O Morgan - You Vs ANACS

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 15 / Views: 492Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
202 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  4:31 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add cboyera to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Older blue holder.what do you think!

Pillar of the Community
United States
5842 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  4:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jaobler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Looks mint state although I can't see the luster very well. If it doesn't make the cut it's AU-58. Otherwise, MS-63. Nice Morgan!
Pillar of the Community
United States
8031 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  4:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ijn1944 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm good with MS62.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10452 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  4:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm at MS63. An ANACS blue label may have it MS64.


Quote:
what do you think


I think it's an above average strike. 1891-o can be a real pancake...
1883-O Nut
Edited by dave700x
01/21/2022 5:34 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
867 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  5:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add flag4 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Typical Orlean's weak strike, but nice toning and eye appeal, MS63
Pillar of the Community
United States
2089 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  5:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add NumisEd to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I say MS64.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
United States
67635 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  6:07 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'll say ANACS graded it MS-64.
Valued Member
United States
202 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  6:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cboyera to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I thought the strike was actually very nice.I agree 1891O can be really bad
Pillar of the Community
United States
1861 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  7:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add southsav to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MS 63 , not too many distracting marks, overall nice!

Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
2709 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  7:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Nice 1891-O. I agree, this is a really nice strike for the year.

IMHO, the contact marks on the cheek and under the arrows on the reverse make this MS-63. I'm not a huge fan of toning, but the even golden toning on this coin and the strike give it good eye appeal for the grade.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1351 Posts
 Posted 01/21/2022  11:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JasonKflo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
old blue holders can also be a reholdered white holder
I think its a 62
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11908 Posts
 Posted 01/22/2022  1:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
that the strike is better than average. would be nice to see out the holder as it appears that all the luster is gone from the cheek and neck. tough call AU58 or MS63. I think its possible she's a slider
Pillar of the Community
United States
637 Posts
 Posted 01/22/2022  3:46 pm  Show Profile   Check pristine2's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add pristine2 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry, but I see a little wear. It's not a strike issue. AU-58.

MS-63 example on left:




Pillar of the Community
United States
4571 Posts
 Posted 01/23/2022  11:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fenton to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'll say 63 for this one but might sneak into a 64 holder.
Valued Member
United States
202 Posts
 Posted 01/23/2022  9:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cboyera to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
ANACS said 63, I paid 62 money but think it is 63 with a shot at 64 level. Now for the real question, as a PCGS snob is this a crossover candidate or would I need to crack and resubmit?
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11908 Posts
 Posted 01/24/2022  09:05 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
assess the cheek area closely for broken luster. I agree the reverse is 64 but unless that luster is there it may come back the same.
  Previous TopicReplies: 15 / Views: 492Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.





Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2022 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2022 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Powered By: