| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 847 |
|
Valued Member
United States
96 Posts |
Edited by Camrdaddy19
08/05/2022 6:06 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
70350 Posts |
A collection like this can't be evaluated or appraised from such small images.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
96 Posts |
@Coinfrog -
I'm just looking for a ballpark on if $300 is too high.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
70350 Posts |
It's basically impossible without seeing the grade and condition of the other keys and seme-keys.
|
|
Moderator
United States
24242 Posts |
@ca, I see that there are no coins in the 1909 S VBD, 1914 D, 1914 S, 1920 S, 1922 no D, 1924 D, and 1931 S slots. Is it true that those are the missing coins from this set? Even knowing which coins are actually in the set would help.
That 1948 cent looks aftermarket plated—is a magnet attracted to it?
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push."
-----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed."
-----King Adz
|
|
Valued Member
United States
96 Posts |
All good questions. I need to get more answers. It's a l9ng distance thing. The seller is a state away.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
70350 Posts |
Spence - haven't checked them all, but there are clearly coins in the '14D and '14-S slots, they're just slightly mispositioned.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
96 Posts |
All good questions. I need to get more answers. It's a long distance thing. The seller is a state away.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17772 Posts |
There is no way to evaluate that collection from the photos you provided . Some better dates and mints are missing . From what I see there is no way I would pay $300 for it . 
In Memory of Butch L.
and Jim U. rest in peace .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3889 Posts |
Quote:
Spence - haven't checked them all, but there are clearly coins in the '14D and '14-S slots, they're just slightly mispositioned. I think that might be coins from the following pages showing through.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2355 Posts |
My somewhat uninformed opinion is that $300 is a little too high for the set presented.
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
70350 Posts |
KenKat - if that's the case, then Houston I think we have a problem.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2888 Posts |
@CAM: I saw so many like this for sell. In your case all BN, and very much circulate. Missing a lot of good ones. The 09-S you put was clean in acid and the acid made his finger print. Me I will stay away from. For 300 you can have better.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
70350 Posts |
This thread is getting confusing. Please simply advise if this set has any of these and show clear pics of each - '11-S, '14-D, '22-D, '22-no D, '24-D, '26-S, '31-S.
So far, price seems way too high.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1812 Posts |
The 1909-S reverse looks to have a rim dent near E Pluribus, which could halve its value. As the only key date clearly present, I'd say $300 is too much. If the 1914-D is present and undamaged, then $300 is still high, just not as overpriced.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
720 Posts |
To keep it simple, I wouldn't buy this for $300.
Edited by NumismaticsFTW
08/07/2022 12:02 am
|
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 847 |
|
Posted 08/05/2022 3:37 pm
