Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 451 |
|
Valued Member
United States
172 Posts |
I have 42 1955-58 Proof Wheat Cents. I have been trying to sort them and figure out my best ones. One of the things that is really confusing me is the CAM designation. On modern coins you have the frosty look which makes it obvious, but that doesn't seem to apply with these older cents. I have looked at quite a few on auction sites but still can't really figure out the difference. Do you guys know how to tell the difference between regular 1950s era proof cents and Cameo ones? Thanks! Here is an average example   Here is a spread of a few of them in high light just to help give an idea of some of the coins.   Edited by Hordfest 06/01/2023 1:35 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
51681 Posts |
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3071 Posts |
the devices of cameo proofs prior to the 1970s will have a light frosting, whereas the ones you show have devices just as reflective as the fields, so are not cameos
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11055 Posts |
I agree. Watch out for those fingerprints! It appears that 1958 Proof cent is already damaged. 
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.artToo many hobbies .... too much work .... not enough time.
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
22375 Posts |
 these are brilliant proofs. But be sure to wear white cotton gloves when handling these.
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
81404 Posts |
Agree, none appears to be a cameo.
|
Moderator
 United States
46035 Posts |
The CAM designation (variety) only is important on 1992 (P), 1992-D, 1998-S, and 1999-S.
Show your support of the Coin Community Family (click here)See what CCF members have for sale (click here)See my collecting interest - (click here)
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18884 Posts |
PR CAM cents are out there, the devices must be very frosted and not shiny like these.
Lincoln Cent Lover!
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11055 Posts |
@nss - I believe we are confusing two topics using the same numismatic acronym. My read is the OP is asking how to identify Proof strike cents with a cameo surface. This would be PRxx CAMYou are correctly referring to the Proof strike Close AM reverse variety. Two separate topics, correctly identified, but using the same designation.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.artToo many hobbies .... too much work .... not enough time.
|
Moderator
 United States
51681 Posts |
Quote: the difference between regular 1950s era proof cents and Cameo ones? Thanks! Starts out as Brilliant proof-Cameo-Deep Cameo-Ultra Cameo. The cameo depends on how much "frost" there is on the coin as well as the mirror background. Read the descriptions in the link I gave from PCGS. John1 
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
Valued Member
Topic StarterUnited States
172 Posts |
I'm convinced that very few of you have looked at Heritage auction archives for Cameo proof cents from this era. The frosted effect is very minimal to non existent on many of them hence my confusion. Like if you look at the high definition pictures they provide its very hard to tell the difference between a regular and CAM cent. In fact in some ways it almost seems like the quality of the strike, a.k.a. the freshness of the proof die makes the most difference in this era, as opppsed to frosted level. But none of you are touching on this factor so I guess I must be incorrect.
Edited by Hordfest 06/02/2023 11:28 am
|
Moderator
 United States
51681 Posts |
Most pre 1970 proof coins are brilliant proofs not cameos. The cameos started,on a regular basis around 1978 . John1 
( I'm no pro, it's just my humble opinion ) Searched 6.5 +/- Million Cents Since 1971
|
|
Replies: 11 / Views: 451 |
|