Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,156 |
|
Valued Member
Canada
342 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5418 Posts |
You need to get the 61st edition of Charlton (2014) with the 50 cent variety section in the back. It was writtten by "pginrh", the guru for 50 cent coins and varieties. He sometimes shows up here for 50 cent questions. Although Charlton could only fit 62 pages on them into the back for that edition, the complete study/ID'd by Paul was way over 100 anomalies, maybe closer to 200. Try to PM him by mail to get some valuable knowledge.
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
94367 Posts |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
59728 Posts |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
Would they polish the die that many times in the same spot? I was also thinking grease, and the progression goes the opposite direction. The grease gets progressively dislodged. Just a theory.
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5418 Posts |
Die polish wouldn't cause that .. the missing parts of the letters are recessed in the die. I think that it is just die wear itself. You see the effects of die polishing in/on the fields.
|
Valued Member
 Canada
342 Posts |
Correct me if I'm wrong but because these letters are incuse on the coin they would be in positive relief on the die and not recessed. This positive relief would also eliminate filled die/struck through grease.
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5418 Posts |
I didn't know that the letters involved were incuse on the coin ... I thought that they were raised. Sorry, I'm not a modern coin collector and even more so with 50 cents. You are right, die polishing COULD wear away those letters, but I still think that it is just die wear from slamming into the planchets.
Edited by okiecoiner 10/24/2023 11:29 am
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1589 Posts |
I agree that it is caused by die polishing, seems to often occur on Canadian fifty cent pieces. I have a few of the so called "missing A" 1968 coins.
|
|
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,156 |
|