| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 723 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
134 Posts |
Hi all...looking for some advice. Does it make sense to get this graded? If so, PCGS or NGC? P.S all the "online grading apps" are saying its XF P.S.S Still a newby...be gentle   |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 Make sure to flatten the staples. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3144 Posts |
This looks like variety 3G. It is a R-6 token, so less common than others. Given the amount of wear (I'd say XF is reasonable, but also could dip into VF range,) the value will be borderline for grading. If you want to have it professionally attributed and protected, I suggest sending to ANACS. Otherwise, it stands fine on its own. I'm a fan of these Feuchtwanger tokens and thank you for sharing with us.
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1121 Posts |
here's alot of nice info---https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/7628/FeuchtwangerOneCent/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1121 Posts |
very nice---here's 3 that I have---   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12046 Posts |
I would be in favor of grading with PCGS or NGC. It is a nice example of a scarcer type. A recent article I read does a good job of spotlighting Feuchtwanger's increasing frustration at years and years of his modified and more grayish 'German Silver' composition (53% Cu, 29% Zn, 18% Ni vs. his original 60/20/20) being repeatedly rejected by the Mint as being impractical for coinage with only the most tenuous of explanations, including his pattern three-cent nickel pieces in 1864, only to see the "zincless" nickel alloys (88% Cu / 12% Ni and the comparatively harder 75% Cu/25% Ni) end up being used 20 years later thanks to Wharton's incessant and very persistent lobbying on behalf of his nickel mining interests. It is a bit ironic that the high-nickel alloys chosen by the Mint for the new 3 cent and 5 cent nickel coinage soon after (in 1865 and 1866 respectively) were more difficult to strike and more difficult on the dies than Feuchtwanger's composition would have been - zinc is a "softer" metal than nickel (2.5 vs 4.0 Mohs hardness) but about the same as copper (also around 2.5-3.0.) In practical terms this means that Feuchtwanger's cents can be approximated to a zincless alloy of perhaps 80-85% copper / 15-20% nickel in terms of striking characteristics, so a bit harder to strike than a Flying Eagle or pre-CuNi Indian Head cent, but a bit easier to strike than the 75/25 that is still in use today. Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
13675 Posts |
to the CCF That is a nice looking example.
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.artToo many hobbies .... too much work .... not enough time. |
|
Valued Member
 United States
134 Posts |
Thank you all. I just joined this forum yesterday and very much appreciate the replies and browsing around.
Cheers and thanks to you all!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
33743 Posts |
This one seems like a good candidate for TPG slabbing. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
Is this also from grandpa's collection? Between this and the Fugio you posted, I can't wait to see what else is in there!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9724 Posts |
I'm in agreement with bump111 could go EF but probably VF (high end) 30 or 35 likely. A nice example of a neat bit of coinage history.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1982, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS) Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Valued Member
United States
134 Posts |
Thanks again all.
@kbbpll. Yes this is part of the grandpa's collection. I'll try to post some more of the "interesting" pieces (at least I think are interesting).
Still navigating the forum to make sure I'm posting in the right area. Wrist hasn't been slapped yet, so I think I'm doing ok :)
Keep the advice and comments coming, its all appreciated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8431 Posts |
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm in favor of having it graded as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3722 Posts |
From handling hundreds of coins each day, I would recommend nothing but PCGS. NGC is losing it's reputation to many collectors, and serious collectors like a PCGS slab. Liquidity and market appeal is all for PCGS. If you have many coins to submit, the price will be a lower price per coin.
I'll vote VF-35.
Suffering from bust half fever. Want to learn how to attribute early half dollars by die variety? Click Here: http://goccf.com/t/434955Shoot me a PM if you are looking to sell bust halves. |
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 723 |
|
Posted 01/13/2024 5:18 pm
