| Author |
Topic  |
Zimmy
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts
|
Just this morning I noticed that my 1979 quarter illustrated below was struck through something smaller than a quarter layer so I got a cent, dime and nickel and laid them over the struck through area as the pictures show below. It was easy to see that the struck through area exactly matched the arc of the cent. This make an interesting error even more special. Thought I would share since this dual denomination occurrence is quite scarce.






|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2719 Posts |
Not struck through a cent. Struck through something the same size as a cent. Nice find.
Edited by DBM 07/21/2012 10:41 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
DBM.....The odds of it being struck through something the exact size of a cent are very slim. The odds of it being struck through a thin cent planchet lamination/defective planchet that matches up perfectly are high. What would you suggest would be hanging around the mint press other than what I described above. Seems obvious to me but maybe I am missing something.
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
665 Posts |
In any case, an interesting error of sorts. Should get plenty of discussion here.
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
791 Posts |
if it was struck through a penny (or penny sized object) wouldnt the rim of the quarter be deformed?
selling world type set, 2500 coins. eBay search user: a.porter
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
The rim area is held in place by the collar. It's hard to tell from the picture but the struck through area does follow across the rim area. The blank planchet was thin enough to allow the rim area to be struck up although not as strong. The best evidence of this is to look at the top rim area on the photo of the dime laying across the subject coin.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
308 Posts |
In my opinion this isn't an error . The surfaces of the "error" part is not correct . Looks to be acid or something similar .
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
Thanks for your opinion but I wasn't posting this for comments to whether its an error or not. I was posting for people to see something unusual. I have been involved in errors for over 30 years and this struck through example is a relatively common error type, especially in US Coins where clad layers split apart from clad planchets and make their way into the striking chamber. The scarcity part is that its struck through what I believe is a thin cent planchet. The surface looks exactly how a struck through error of this type is supposed to look like. I am 100% sure of the error type and 99% that is struck through a thin cent planchet. Most Canadian error collectors are not real familiar with this type since it occurs more often on US Error coins. Google "struck through clad layer error" and I am sure you will see other types like this one.
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2719 Posts |
Your quarter and the 1cent of that era are not clad,the quarter is 100% nickel and cents were solid bronze.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
DBM....thanks for your input but I never said the Canadian coins were. I was only using the US clad layer coinage as examples of how this error type can occur and what is looks like. Since this error type is much scarcer on Canadian coinage, I don't have any Canadian examples to reference. I am well familiar with coin specifications for both US and Canada coinage, primarily from specializing in off metal/wrong planchets errors.
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1080 Posts |
You still need to determine where a thin one cent "planchet" would come from. I don't think it is something you can just assume. It's the critical piece of the puzzle.
If such a thing existed, then there should be examples of blank and struck from 1920-1996.
Out of curiosity, how thin would it have to be?
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3048 Posts |
I would send a pm to Mike Diamond. I'm sure he would have insite.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. Douglas Adams
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
308 Posts |
Zimmy - could you post a better image ? It doesn't look like an error to me .
|
|
Valued Member
United States
126 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
308 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
135 Posts |
|
Topic  |
|