| Author |
Topic  |
|
|
coinyoungsta
Valued Member

United States
97 Posts |
Posted 11/07/2009 3:21 pm
|
how much would you say this coin costs, seller has it as AU, pcgs has it as environmental damage, what do you think



|
|
Send note to staff
|
|
How can I help support Coin Community?
|
|
hippiebrian
Valued Member

United States
356 Posts |
|
|
Podoprigora
Valued Member
United States
375 Posts |
|
|
SuperDave
Moderator

USA
5116 Posts |
|
|
coinyoungsta
Valued Member

United States
97 Posts |
Posted 11/07/2009 8:37 pm
|
thanks guys I figured $60 for the coin was a lot but I wanted to see what yall thought
|
Send note to staff  |
|
|
johnny54321
Pillar Of The Community

USA
883 Posts |
|
|
SuperDave
Moderator

USA
5116 Posts |
|
|
johnny54321
Pillar Of The Community

USA
883 Posts |
Posted 11/08/2009 4:43 pm
|
Quote: ere's my thinking, with the understanding that we're working from pretty small photos.
The shield details are pretty strong, indicative of a good strike. There's a "plateau" area down the middle of the obverse. I see that as wear, being pretty much flat to the dark edges. On the reverse, I see very little left of the breast feathers. Given what seems like a nice strike, for me this adds up to XF. Of course, with such small photos I'm just as likely to change my mind if I saw the coin in-hand.
Fair enough, thanks for the explanation. I see a lot of "roughness" on the breast that leads me to think there is a lot of detail there, but it may just be the photo. Although I don't see "luster" from these pics, the overall look of the coin leads me to think there may be a lot remaining, but I could be wrong. I agree that I would need to see it in hand to make a final decision as the pics may be misleading.
|
Send note to staff  |
|
|
SuperDave
Moderator

USA
5116 Posts |
Posted 11/08/2009 5:24 pm
|
Keep in mind, the minute the term "environmental damage" comes up, all considerations of luster go out the window. Even if the coin has only weathered in the outdoors - PCGS only chooses one code to give a Genuine slab and the coin could have been further cleaned after discovery - its' surfaces can no longer be trusted.
|
|
Send note to staff  |
|
| |
Topic  |
|