| Author |
Topic  |
|
|
GoldRush58
Pillar Of The Community

United States
788 Posts |
Posted 07/29/2010 9:03 pm
|
I have been looking at a XF 1829/7 Bust half, at a local shop.
I know it is hard to put a value on a coin with out seeing it, or a picture. I guess I am just hoping there are some experts here that can give me a ballpark figure on what it should sell for.
The offer is at $160.00 right now.
I looked numismedia shows XF-40 at $245 2010 redbook shows XF-40 at $200
Again I hope I can get some input from the CBH experts .. as far as .. is this a good deal and should I look for anything on the coin.
|
Edited by GoldRush58 - 07/30/2010 4:10 pm |
|
Send note to staff
|
|
How can I help support Coin Community?
|
|
matt
New Member

USA
20 Posts |
Posted 07/29/2010 9:49 pm
|
Eye appeal on bust coinage varies widely. Generally I would be willing to pay $160 for an uncleaned, attractive, XF-detailed bust half of even the most common date. I would use your best judgment. If it's blotchy, rough, weak, cleaned or unattractive, $160 may not be the best deal afterall.
|
Send note to staff  |
|
|
GoldRush58
Pillar Of The Community

United States
788 Posts |
|
|
bherring1964
Pillar Of The Community

USA
2321 Posts |
|
|
GoldRush58
Pillar Of The Community

United States
788 Posts |
Posted 07/29/2010 11:56 pm
|
bherring1964
Thanks .. I did not know what it listed at in greysheet.
When I looked at it today, what I remember it has a couple small black spots on the cheek. It seemed to be a good strike with good detail.
I like going back and taking a second look, I seemed to see more that way. If it still looks good tomorrow .. I will pick it up.
|
Send note to staff  |
|
|
cperry8483
Valued Member

United States
63 Posts |
|
|
Moe145
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1611 Posts |
Posted 07/30/2010 3:13 pm
|
FYI: 1829 over 7 CBH, Grade F-12, paid $122.00 about a year ago



|
Send note to staff  |
|
|
GoldRush58
Pillar Of The Community

United States
788 Posts |
Posted 07/30/2010 4:09 pm
|
I am not sure why on am on the fence with this coin. But I did go ahead and buy it this afternoon.
Moe, Thanks for posting pics of your coin. From what I do know about these coins, I am thinking yours was a early die strike.
Mine shows the stars stretching to the rims, and the arrow shafts on mine are missing part of the shafts. Yours are a little weak, so I guess this is common to this coin.
Here are a couple pics, I guess I really need to set up something better to take pics .. I can see the holding the camera does not let me get very good focus.



|
Send note to staff  |
|
|
delaner
Valued Member

United States
351 Posts |
|
|
GoldRush58
Pillar Of The Community

United States
788 Posts |
Posted 07/30/2010 9:45 pm
|
delaner Thanks for the comments. The detail of this coin is really great .. I think even better in hand then in the pics.
As for maybe having a older cleaning .. for me it is hard to tell, I looked at this coin several times trying to determine if it may have been cleaned. I don't think I have enough knowledge on these type coins.
I do think I can see luster on the coin. I am open to expert opinions on this.
The more I look at it the more I like it. I like the idea that this coin was made when Andrew Jackson was president.
|
Send note to staff  |
|
|
Moe145
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1611 Posts |
Posted 07/31/2010 2:46 pm
|
Goldrush! Man, what a beautiful example of the type! 
If I figure the Overtons correctly, mine appears to be an early O-101 and yours is a O-101a. (This die state is identical to the O-101 die state EXCEPT on the reverse of the O-101a the die has been heavily lapped.
This lapping has removed the tail feathers, the feathers at the right side of the shield and a large portion of the arrow shafts at the claws). (From Coinzip.com)
|
Send note to staff  |
|
|
GoldRush58
Pillar Of The Community

United States
788 Posts |
Posted 07/31/2010 3:00 pm
|
Moe Again thanks .. that is some good information.
|
Send note to staff  |
|
| |
Topic  |
|