| Author |
 Topic  |
Munhe
New Member
Canada
12 Posts
|
This quarter looks nicer than my 1921 (previously posted). I used the digital camera rather than the scanner this time, but I am still trying to improve my technique (I used three light sources for these photos). This coin looks much brighter and is more detailed than these pictures suggest, so there is still room for improvement. Maybe the lights were too bright ?
Based on these photos, how does this coin grade?
|
|
|
|
New Member
Canada
12 Posts |
Here are a couple more photos.   |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2728 Posts |
Wear wise AU
But what's all the pitting?
|
|
New Member
Canada
12 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2728 Posts |
That last photo really brings out the detail,
AU58
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
268 Posts |
Nice coin. My guess would be a strong EF, maybe AU. I'm a little concerned about the wear pattern and the fine vertical scratches. Would be nice to see in hand and under a loop.
|
|
New Member
Canada
12 Posts |
I prefer using my scanner as it is so much easier to use.  |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
2620 Posts |
Is it just the lighting, or am I seeing some really cool die clashes in front of the King's crown and forehead?
"Research is what I am doing, when I don't know what I am doing" --Wernher von Braun
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
307 Posts |
I know this is going to sound weird and kind of a double standard....if it was going in my collection I would give it a VF due to the wear...it is close enough that if someone who owned it wanted a grade I would say AU
IMO
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
279 Posts |
|
|
New Member
48 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4151 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
352 Posts |
I'd say EF-45 cleaned as well
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
899 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
404 Posts |
AU-50 Quit wipping it. It will not get any better. LOL.
|
|
Valued Member
141 Posts |
Fantastic looking quarter...good pics with the camera too. 
|
|
Topic |
|
Posted 06/28/2011 9:41 pm
