Author |
Replies: 474 / Views: 28,703 |
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
7364 Posts |
This week, let's see coins of the last third of the 18th century: Clement XIV (1769-1775) Pius VI (1775-1799) Sede Vacante (1799-1800) (sorry for being late in rolling back the clock). A bit more on the tumultuous historical context ... When Pius VI became pope in 1775, the Papal States looked more-or-less like this:  Additionally included was the Comtat Venaissin, a chunk of northern Provence, France, held by the popes since the late 1200s. Things changed quicky with the French Revolution (which was notoriously hostile to the Catholic church). The Comtat Venaissin was taken by the revolutionaries in 1791, at which point Pope Pius VI severed diplomatic ties with France. Then, in 1796, Napoleon invaded Italy, penetrating as far as the Adriatic provinces of the Papal States, Romagna and Marche in the map above. Pius was forced to cede these in the peace of Tolentino (1797). But it didn't take long for a pretext for Napoleon to grab Rome came about (February 1798). When Pius refused to cede authority there, he was imprisoned, and died in mid-1799 in southern France. Since holding conclave in enemy territory (Rome under French rule) was out of the question, the cardinals made the unusual decision to hold conclave in Venice, at the time under Austrian rule (it has not been held outside Rome since). It took more than six months to elect Pius VII, whose coins we saw last week. He didn't fare much better in his on-and-off relationship with the French (1809-1813 was spent in exile outside the Papal States), but he managed to outlast Napoleon, and regain his territory after the 1814 abdication. I've finally got some coins to contribute, starting with this 1796 2 1/2 baiocco, nicknamed "sampietrino" struck in Ancona, one of the earliest places in the Italian province of Marche to strike coins under Papal authority:  Copyright Bertolami Fine Arts As best I can tell, 1796 was the last year this mint struck coins under Papal authority.
Edited by tdziemia 03/04/2025 07:05 am
|
Moderator
 United States
77075 Posts |
very nice tdc 
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
20696 Posts |
Excellent coin, tdziemia, and thank you for the historical summary!
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2685 Posts |
That's a really nice example of the 2 1/2 baiocco, Much much nicer than my example.
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2685 Posts |
I'll post two different types of 1 baiocco,issued by Pius VI. The first is from 1782 and has quite an unusual date placement on the obverse where the tassels of the keys dissect the date.  This baiocco has the usual heraldic achievement on the obverse with a simple text on the reverse. 
Edited by Bacchus2 03/04/2025 05:51 am
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
7364 Posts |
Quote: an unusual date placement on the obverse where the tassels of the keys dissect the date.  Don't think I've seen a date split with that cadence before (1 digit / 2 digits / 1 digit) I see that Numista has the second one as ND (1785). Pius VI's reign began in February 1775, so year 11 of his reign would have run from February 1785 to February 1786. Maybe there were mint records attesting that none were struck in 1786. Two factoids related to his tenure. At the time of his death, he was the longest reigning pope (24 yrs, 6 mos.) since Saint Peter in the first century! And, he established the first Catholic episcopate in the U.S. (Baltimore, 1789).
Edited by tdziemia 03/04/2025 07:08 am
|
Moderator
 United States
33739 Posts |
Quote: I thought we'd see coins from more members, but it's early days (most of mine are from the 18th and 17th centuries). Me too! I'll have to see if I can finally add something from my collection this week.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
Moderator
 United States
77075 Posts |
|
Moderator
 United States
171034 Posts |
Fantastic examples! 
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
63514 Posts |
Nice pair, Bacchus2! 
Errers and Varietys.
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
7364 Posts |
My other coin of Pius VI is this hefty (10+ grams) 5 baiocco struck in Perugia in 1797 (pontificate Anno XXIII). Looks like it's been through a war (oh, wait! maybe it was!)   Since the iconography of saints on coins is a personal interest, I like that the image in this one does not define Mary in terms of her relationship to her child, like all those Hungarian and Bavarian madonnas (though the inscription reminds us). The Saint Peter a few posts earlier, on the other hand, bears a very standard representation of a bald, bearded guy holding keys.
Edited by tdziemia 03/04/2025 7:20 pm
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
63514 Posts |
Nice addition, tdziemia.
Errers and Varietys.
|
Moderator
 United States
171034 Posts |
Very nice! 
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2685 Posts |
Those big hefty coins are always nice to hold.
"Looks like it's been through a war (oh, wait! maybe it was!)"
You are of course very correct here. Amazing to think that this coin was struck in 1797 - and the following year the French Revolutionary Army occupied the city of Rome (creating the Roman Republic) and then the Papal States were restored the year. after that. So it saw quite a bit of history in the early years of it's existence.
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2685 Posts |
To keep up the coins of Pius VI I have added in this 2 Carlini coin from 1781. Again the engravers have been inventive on the obverse in how they have added in the regnal year between the tassels of the decorative cord at the bottom of the crossed keys motif. However the design is slightly unbalanced by having the A on one side and a star on the other. On the reverse the text does appear slightly uneven in size (see large L in centre as an example) but I think adds to the charm of the coin where an engraver has clearly prepared all this by hand.  Apparently the actual denomination "carlini" can be traced back to the reign of Charles I of Anjou (Carlo I d'Angiņ) in the Kingdom of Naples during the 13th century. So it's a derivative of "Charles".
Edited by Bacchus2 03/05/2025 04:51 am
|
|
Replies: 474 / Views: 28,703 |