| Author |
 Replies: 22 / Views: 2,604 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
My call is a MS65 FH
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
I'm on the MS66FH bandwagon. I see NO distractions... Superb SLQ!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2596 Posts |
I will go high on this one I will say 66 from the luster and strike.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7202 Posts |
She is a stunning quarter, MS 65+.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
265 Posts |
Great looking coin, love the SLQ's. I agree with sel 691, I am going to go a little lower and say MS64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
I'll be surprised if it doesn't get MS66
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1432 Posts |
Very Nice! MS 65/66  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
MS-65, probably FH even though it doesn't look that strong in the photos. Maybe 66
Edited by coinguybrian
01/02/2012 1:54 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2604 Posts |
Looks MS65 to me too! That's a beauty!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
548 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15571 Posts |
 David |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
763 Posts |
Ok, here is the PCGS grade:  I think it may be a bit conservative, but I am happy with the PCGS grade. The price would have doubled at MS65FH and it would have been out of my price range. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
548 Posts |
The lower the TPG grade, the better the deal for the buyer. You won! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
PCGS had the coin in hand, we didn't!
I suspect that, because of their 'adavntage', they could see tiny things that we could not see, and as they have a reputation to protect, so they have to grade as accurately as they see fit.
That is why I was looking for a pictorial 'advantage', (with a larger picture), to have a level playing field, so to speak.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
5375 Posts |
Still a harsh grade IMO, should have been a 65 minimum.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,604 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 01/02/2012 07:25 am
