| Author |
Replies: 26 / Views: 3,437 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Becoming so common that at one coin show a dealer was selling faked 1856 Flying Eagles for $10. I bought one for the fun of it and something to put in an Album. If you know the person selling one, suggest it should be sent to a TPGS for authenticating. You can tell them if it's real, you'll pay for that service. If not, he pays.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
related question: does anyone have an estimate of what percentage of the 1856's are slabbed?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
PCGS claims 151 graded. NGC claims 370 graded.
Edited by SteveCaruso 04/01/2012 9:15 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
DO NOT purchase this coin raw, even from a dealer.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
There were 2250 were minted. There are 521 are slabbed and genuine from PCGS and NGC (plus a few by ANACS?). To me, that says that there are 1729 Flying Eagle cents from 1856 that have some kind of problem with them. Then there are the fake ones.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
652 Posts |
All it means is that 1729 are unslabbed & unaccounted for. Not everyone gets rare coins slabbed.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
153 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
I'm only being a little cynical here. But you know darned well that any slabbed 1856 with a problem is cracked out of the slab and that most of the problem ones aren't slabbed at all and are sold raw.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
Yes, the slabbing figures don't take into account any crack-outs *or* resubmissions.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
652 Posts |
My point was that a lot of us old collectors don't play the slab game that started in the 80s. We old timers have a lot of very rare coins like the 1856 FE that are authentic and we don't need them in a slab. You don't see a lot of them posted, as some of us don't want the world to know we have them (for security reasons). We know they're authentic by using all of the same indicators that the TPG authenticators use. After all, those TPG folks, hopefully, got a lot of their knowledge & experience by being collectors first. They're kept in safe deposit boxes, safes, or in some cases are in inherited collections where the owners don't really know what they have, other than the collections that they inherited are probably worth a lot. Because a coin isn't in a slab does not mean it's a problem coin. The 1856 FE was not a coin meant for circulation, they were a pattern cent, and they were given to members of congress, dignitaries, friends, etc. They were known at that time to be something special, and most, if not all, were safely put away for that reason. To blindly assume that any that haven't been slabbed are problem coins is really a false assumption to make, IMHO.
Edited by mackwork 04/05/2012 10:12 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2757 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
Couldn't agree with you more, mackwork. I think that the point is more that in this day and age, given that there are more counterfeits (and convincing counterfeits) than there are genuine pieces, that investing in an authenticated specimen for this rarity is the most prudent route to take to avoid fraud; not that any un-slabbed specimen should be suspect off the bat. That would be foolishness, and exactly what TPG companies would want. :-) I'm exceedingly critical of the practice of slabbing coins and TPG marketing schemes; however, I would not personally recommend purchasing any 1856 FEC that I have not seen myself in-hand -- with my Counterfeit Detection equipment at my disposal -- to anyone unless it was authenticated by a reputable third party.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Quote: there are still a ton out there in bad shape. Like this one Ouch, it looks buried, scratched when dug, then aggressively cleaned.  I wonder at the story behind that one?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
652 Posts |
Steve - I agree on "in this day and age" that a coin like this is best bought in a slab by most collectors. While fakes have always been around, the number of fakes has grown tremendously, and some of the fakes are extremely well done. It's ridiculous that even many of the more common coins now have fakes out there. It's a shame that the 1856 that was sold on ebay was allowed to corrode like that.
Edited by mackwork 04/06/2012 08:41 am
|
|
CCF Sponsor
United States
702 Posts |
vermontensium - I'd buy an 1856 raw from Rick Snow. In fact, was very tempted last week.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 26 / Views: 3,437 |
Page 2 of 2
|