| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 6,213 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
I have a DA96 688 963 Note with same gap, also the note is printed 1-2mm to the right(meaning looks like someone cut a 1mm or 2, it has'nt been but is this rare?)on number side, other side normal
Edited by lostsean
06/14/2012 4:01 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
869 Posts |
Lostsean, if the margin is way out of wack, like literally 5mm or more it may be considered scarce but not rare. When you start pushing out even further, you'd probably be talking rare.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
 Goatie man, on that I re looked at that note DA96 and compared it with a AA96(laid it over the clear windows and aligned stars, (so DA on top of AA)Colored strips lines up also, but note was about 2-2.5mm longer on left and about 1.5mm shorter at the top. It is both side that are doing it, not 1. hope this helps out on one side |
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
869 Posts |
LostSean; the best thing about that DA96 is it's a scarcer note to find. The issue with a minor mis-alignment is that dealers won't consider this to be an error &/or fault. If a collector considers it a fault, it's a different story completely.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
869 Posts |
Also, one year of notes were actually about 2-3mm longer than the rest. I'm not sure which year, but I remember looking through quite a lot of notes & noticing the same year again & again.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
I have also noticed the 2-3mm difference some $50 notes. I haven't looked through nearly enough to determine that it occurs in particular on one year.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
Ok here is next lot
BK08 371 761 (over print on middle 1 IS 3 Times thicker?)
GF95 have print numbers bottom left corner and in middle of note
on a 45degree angle
BA 03 268 894 (Has a AM print, looked it up Ba last of run then AM?)
Will place photos a.s.a.p as the optimizer is'nt working..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
If the photos are of whole notes they may be over 5MB which will bust the optimiser.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
869 Posts |
AM print looks like someone has had a go at them with a stamp/stampad etc.
As for the BK08 371761; the first one being thicker. I see quite a few examples of that in $50's. I've kept only one of thos because the 9 in it was so thick that it almost hooked over completely.
The final pic, same; someone has had a go at them with a stamp/stampad etc. The numbers are larger than the serial number, the positioning of them is not correct for it to be an error, because the serial number is not reversed.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
so nothing worth keeping?
i kept AM one , as I looked it up and prefixed aa-am ? ba, thought maybe it was done by bank or something, would they do this? have you seen any other examples?
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
218 Posts |
Not sure if this helps...
I have a pair of DA96 $50's and the funny thing is, one has an even so thin gap, where you indicated and the other has no gap...despite them being a consecutive pair. ?!!?!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
869 Posts |
Lostsean; I have seen stacks of different stamps on different denominations of notes. I am a nootler, so I've seen quite a decent amount. I haven't kept any becuase of the fact, that none are relevant.
BankNoteLover; Consecutive note serials are actually printed on different sheets (e.g 135421, 135422). Consecutive prefix serials are printed on the same sheet (e.g AA, AB).
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
145 Posts |
Thanks mate,
There, gone now :)
Just like to be 101% sure as I'm learning fast, just not the technicals :)
Thank for your ongoing help
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 6,213 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/15/2012 10:15 pm
