| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,258 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
I could even go 65PL but I'll stick with 64PL, nice!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
I think the dings on the eyebrow would keep it from a 65
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
So, What's the verdict? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I will also guess MS-64 PL.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
987 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
243 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
474 Posts |
Before seeing the other guesses, I had already decided on MS64PL... so that will be my guess as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
I think MS64. A real Beauty! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2130 Posts |
You all did quite well. But, I don't understand why this didn't get a PL designation? Is a PL designation something that you pay extra for? Like varieties or errors. IMO this is also PL. 
Edited by chris12018 05/22/2012 05:58 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
No, you don't have to pay extra for PL or DMPL
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2130 Posts |
Canadian-Banknotes, Thank You for the info.
Then how did they miss this as PL?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2130 Posts |
Would it be worth cracking and resubmitting?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1370 Posts |
There is roughly a $75 difference retail with a PL designation. Not sure if that would be worth the chance with a re submission. The guidelines for PL and DMPL have gotten tougher it seems.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,258 |
Page 2 of 2
|