| Author |
Replies: 37 / Views: 3,117 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2077 Posts |
There are thousands of misgraded coins on ebay. I think anyone who buys a coin based on stated grade without examining it, deserves what they get. The only listings I report are one with counterfeits or forgeries or if the seller has some other deceptive practice.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1704 Posts |
Quote:I really think they ( ebay) intended to have no grading but from their rules they really are kind of poorly written. Their policy is quite clear and precise. Since grading is subjective ebay has taken the position that a person, collector or dealer, isn't qualified to make the distinction between a VF-25 and a VF-30 so they won't allow the numbers but will let you specify a grade which is perfectly reasonable. So many people who haven't been collectors before the grading services got started just don't know how to grade coins themselves and have come to rely on others to grade coins for them. Every collector should have at least a copy of the ANA Grading Standards and Photograde in their numismatic library. Quote: You could also argue any grade reference is an estimation of value, but its not a direct one. A grade reference absolutely is a direct estimation of value whether or not you add the Sheldon number or not. If a person sees what they believe is an over graded or overpriced coin on ebay so what they don't have to bid on it. There are plenty of other places on the WWW where collectors can buy from honest and reputable dealers besides the monopolistic ebay and their anti buyer and seller policies. Ed ANA LM-3175
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:Their policy is quite clear and precise. Since grading is subjective ebay has taken the position that a person, collector or dealer, isn't qualified to make the distinction between a VF-25 and a VF-30 so they won't allow the numbers but will let you specify a grade which is perfectly reasonable. So many people who haven't been collectors before the grading services got started just don't know how to grade coins themselves and have come to rely on others to grade coins for them. Every collector should have at least a copy of the ANA Grading Standards and Photograde in their numismatic library. Thats my point exactly though. Very few people are qualified or could correct say vf25 vs vf30 and those same people arent necessarily qualified to say vf vs au either. My point is either allow it or dont. If they really are worried about bad grading get rid of it all together. But if your going to allow someone to guess au or ms might as well allow them to put a number on there. I dont ever go by what they say, in fact I dont buy raw coins off ebay anyway and thats one of the reasons. But theyre still going to price it at whatever vf or au or ms level they think the coin is anyway so allowing that at all undermines their no raw grading policy
|
|
Locked
822 Posts |
Quote: A grade reference absolutely is a direct estimation of value whether or not you add the Sheldon number or not. Complete hogwash, Check sold 1921 "MS" Morgans on eBay, at the time of this posting they went anywhere from $27 to $630.
Edited by scubu 06/23/2012 08:34 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4337 Posts |
the bottom line, for me, is protecting the "less than sophisticated consumer"
There are cases litigated daily in this country across various markets and mediums where deceptive, or perceived deceptive, advertising techniques will take advantage of the less than sophisticated consumer.
*** Edited by Staff for Family Friendliness *** but I am all for a clear and defined rules set where ambiguity is removed and there are no more resulting assumptions on behalf of certain consumers with regards to the level of coin they are buying.
As ridiculous as it might sound to some of you, a truly less than sophisticated coin buyer might think all "VF" coins look like that junk I provided the link to.
Yes, we should educate ourselves but we should equally rely on so called experts and pillars of the selling community to not deal in half truths to the unsuspecting.
At least this is how I would present it to a judge...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2049 Posts |
Wow now we're talking about litigation and judges. I'm not sure how that applies to an ebay auction with a subjective grading issue. When people here present a coin for grading, we usually get a good range of estimates. Grading is purely subjective and just because one calls a coin VF and another calls it F or VF-30, it doesn't mean that anyone is right or wrong. And certainly it doesn't warrant reporting an auction or bringing up legalities in my opinion. What if I go to a garage sale or a thrift store and see an item that I feel like they are asking too much money for? Should I call the police? Should I report it to the local newspaper? Should I tell them that they are trying to commit fraud simply because I don't agree with their asking price? If your goal is to protect the less than sophisticated consumer, that's your choice, but I think you will drive yourself crazy if you want to go about it this way (reporting auctions where you don't agree with the grade or price and then posting it to a forum asking others to do the same). I believe in a free market where buyers and sellers are free to conduct business without others trying to interfere unless it's a blatant case of misrepresentation (trying to pass off a fake 1895 Morgan as real for example). In this case, I don't see it being even remotely close to a blatant case of the coin being misrepresented and therefore there is no reason whatsoever to report the listing.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
From being on "both sides of the coin" (so to speak)as a buyer and a seller I really don't see a problem with a seller giving his estimate of a general grade category. I provide an estimate of every coin I list that is RAW (most of my listings are of RAW coins). I do qualify the estimate with a "(est.)" however. ebay is like Alice's Restaurant - you find it all up there and "caveat emptor" certainly applies, but there are enough honest sellers providing their honest assessments of RAW coin grades to mitigate against removing any reference to estimated grade for all. As an aside, one of the highest end sellers (and provider of official input to the annual Red Book) virtually ALWAYS ups his grade estimate one generic grade on his listings (ID withheld for obvious reasons). That's my story Your Honor and I'm sticking to it!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
This all comes back to personal responsibility. Why isn't it the buyer's responsibility to know what he is buying? ebay can not fix "stupid" with policies. You can go to ebay and pick any other category and find sellers all over the place on description and price for the same type item. Personally, I would not have the guts to sell that coin as a VF nor would I price it at $100. When looking at the listing the first thing I did was pull a Red Book out to see if it was a better date. With the internet, anyone has the ability to check out what they are buying before they place their bid.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
505 Posts |
Quote: , I didnt cry illegal, I cried taking advantage of the unknown...u endorse this?
dsfreeworld....Grading is Very subjective,If this guy says its VF and I agree,wheres the problem? If you want to protect consumers,heres a site you might be interested in http://forums.consumerreports.org/n...btag=cr-home
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
A coin is worth what one is willing to pay for it. Yeah, there is a FMV but, how bad you want it?
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: A coin is worth what one is willing to pay for it. I was just about to say that. Also theres FMV and ebay FMV. Numismedia, RedBook ect dont account for the 10 percent sellers fee. This coin is still high but agree with the above posters that by no means does this coin even remotely resemble a deceptive buyer situation. Those cases are largely with defective products or medicines that dont work that were covered up and sold anyway. Saying something is VF when its really F would not begin to approach that standard. I also agree save the reporting for fake coins or flat out listings that lie like saying something is silver or gold when its not. If youre standard is just to report things that are overpriced youd have to report half of ebay listings as a whole
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2049 Posts |
Quote: This coin is still high but agree with the above posters that by no means does this coin even remotely resemble a deceptive buyer situation. Those cases are largely with defective products or medicines that dont work that were covered up and sold anyway. Saying something is VF when its really F would not begin to approach that standard. Agree 100%. We don't know what the seller has into the coin, but also that's not our business. It's his coin, he is free to ask whatever selling price he wants to. With grading being so subjective, one could call the coin VF, another VF+ and then others may say F or even VG. Quote:If youre standard is just to report things that are overpriced youd have to report half of ebay listings as a whole This is so true. One would literally have to report auction after auction and do it non stop for days, and still wouldn't even hit the tip of the iceberg. The bottom line is that reporting an item because you feel it's overpriced is equivalent to filing a frivilous lawsuit. It's a waste of time and accomplishes nothing. I won't say any more on this subject as I think I have made it pretty clear how I feel about this particular subject. :P
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: Agree 100%. We don't know what the seller has into the coin, but also that's not our business. It's his coin, he is free to ask whatever selling price he wants to. With grading being so subjective, one could call the coin VF, another VF+ and then others may say F or even VG. If we could sue over disagreements then I need a court order for PCGS to reholder some of my 69s as 70s  But I definitely agree with everything you said. Theres a big difference between wanting to much money and actual fraud
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
Why report this? They can ask any price, and describe a coin any way they want other than using a numeric scale which is reserved for ebay approved TPG's. Sounds fair to me. I'm allowed to say my coin is beautiful if that's what I think. I can also say it is "very fine" when really its a mint state coin. If I showed my sister an MS65 coin, she might say its "perfect". It's all a matter of opinion and everyone has a right to their opinion. As for the price, look at it the other way ... as a buyer, you are allowed to offer any amount you want. Do you not lowball sometimes when making offers to sellers? Of course, everyone does that... as a buyer, we all want the lowest price possible, and as a seller we want the highest we can get. That's completely fair. If you look through the ebay history of completed listings you will see that basically none of these massively overpriced items sell... so don't worry about it.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
227 Posts |
Quote: Yes, we should educate ourselves but we should equally rely on so called experts and pillars of the selling community to not deal in half truths to the unsuspecting. Dude, that's what TPG's are for. If you don't like it then only buy certified coins.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 37 / Views: 3,117 |
Page 3 of 3
|