| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,897 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1372 Posts |
Speaking of environmental damage ... I just finished burying a handful of coins that I got in a type set that were hideously polished. I used an air eraser to matte the polished surfaces and remove any silicone residue, and the acid rain will do the rest.
There was nothing noteworthy in the set unless you count the 1901-S morgan. It was low grade though. It's taking a dirt nap now.
Environmental damage will be a step up for those coins.
Chance
Edited by Chancellor Sutler 08/09/2012 10:34 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
How look do you plan on having them in the dirt?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1372 Posts |
I figure it'll only take a few weeks in this part of the country. There's been a lot of strip mining here and the soil has relatively high sulphur content.
In the air eraser ... I used baking soda. They looked so pitifully white when I buried them.
Once I take them from the soil and rinse them off, I may carry the whole pocketful for a week or so.
Chance
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
620 Posts |
EF-45 Enviro damage and an old cleaning. Still a great War betweeb the States era Half.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7202 Posts |
XF details on your 1861, stellar 1843!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
EF details, cleaned on the 1861. A marvelous 1843! Care to show the reverse?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1372 Posts |
The 61 isn't without problems, but it's a dandy for a 35 dollar coin. The 43 was a whole bunch more samoalians. I keep hoping to stumble across a nice w/arrows specimen for not a lot of dough ... but not yet.
Chance
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1372 Posts |
Here's the reverse of the 1843. Chance 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
432 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1372 Posts |
This coin arrived this morning, and it's been polished previously. Despite what the seller's picture seems to convey, it's not dry and porous looking "in hand", and I don't see any sign of environmental damage. It's retoning in a rather ugly fashion though. My pictures aren't a whole lot more revealing than the seller's, and I'll try some in alternate lighting to see if I can get better ones. I'd buy this coin again for 34.99, so no regrets. Chance  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1372 Posts |
I know ... never clean 'em. I couldn't stand the toning, so I dropped this into a bowl of diluted ammonia for awhile. I don't think there are many people who collect on a shoestring, that wouldn't consider this coin for their type set at 35 dollars. I like it much better now. Eye appeal is a big part of the game for me. It had already been cleaned and polished, so I don't have a shred of guilt over doing it. Chance  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3843 Posts |
For $35 you can't go wrong on a SLH with that much detail remaining, I agree that removing the funky toning has really increased the eye appeal of the coin. The downside that I see is the reverse really shows the numerous gouges much more easily than before. Still it will look really nice in your 7070, especially the obverse. Also its amazing how the coin looks like it has a bit more detail post cleaning.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1372 Posts |
The coin looks great "in hand" .. remember this is greatly magnified.
Chance
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7202 Posts |
Nice coin, note worthy date and great change of appearance. Your last photos do give her justice to the cleaning.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,897 |
Page 2 of 2
|