| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,409 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189340 Posts |
Quote:
... who would fake such a damaged coin? Someone who thinks that we think that no one would ever fake such a damaged coin. But in the end, I am always optimistic.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5833 Posts |
Looks like two completely different coins from the photos.
At least they could taken a closer picture, but what a find of the decade if its genuine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
619 Posts |
I think one photo is actually a scan. That's why the color is way off. Otherwise, it looks like the same coin.
|
|
Valued Member
 494 Posts |
I was just re-reading the "1955/55 find" thread - such an amazing discovery. Than stumbling upon the 1943 story... Last time I read a post on facebook randomly about someone finding an 1859 Indian head - the next roll I found my 1890...
I grabbed CWR pennies while dumping halves today... maybe I'll find a 1974 Aluminum!!
Actually love the story - too bad the kid isn't a CCF member - we'd have heard about it minutes after it was found....
I hope everyone that reads this goes out and grabs some rolls to go through - sometimes it can get monotonous when you don't find anything of value. So may this story be your inspiration to shrug off the burnout and snatch some history!
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
It needs to be sent to ANACS. Lot of PMD there. The PMD could be a mask to cover up an altered coin. swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2224 Posts |
Can't see the coin in the top photo, but the bottom one is fake. The 3 in the date is the wrong type. A genuine 1943 cent would have the bottom of the 3 hanging down. Here is a photo of a genuine 1943 copper cent. Look at it and then look at the last 3 in the newspaper photo. http://coins.ha.com/c/item.zx?saleN...o=5491#Photo |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5833 Posts |
Good catch coppernickeldaddy! Probably a 48 altered cent?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2224 Posts |
I was thinking a 13, 23, or 33 with a damaged third digit. I posted a comment on the newspaper's comment page.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
I personally have (got in a roll of cull wheats from another collector) a lovely 1945 (probably) cent with damaged last digit... the digit is incredibly damaged - in such an exact way that for someone who didn't know about the steel cents (or what their last digit looks like) the obvious guess for the date would've been 1943. (My "educated" guess isn't, because, even besides the copper thing, the digit shape is nothing like a real '43.) I wonder if I could ever sell it for a large sum of money (all I need is a vague enough description... something like "copper Lincoln Wheat cent, probably 1943"). |
|
Valued Member
494 Posts |
@ January1may - That may be true of sub $100 coins that may "pass" as something else, but something like this wouldn't be a "fuzzy-pic" ebay score - than again.... haha... try it! Again, as long as your auction description is truthful - more power to ya! |
|
Moderator
United States
189340 Posts |
Quote:The PMD could be a mask to cover up an altered coin. I agree. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
937 Posts |
I agree as well. I have a supposed Roman Galba denarius that looks like it was used for dart-catching -- the faker was trying to cover up the fact that it was a cast copy. After I looked closely I saw it for what it was, but the dealer made me an offer that was re-e-eal cheap or I wouldn't have even considered it. At the moment it holds a place in my fakes and forgeries collection as a "what to watch out for"; a good study piece.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
364 Posts |
Don't forget that kids love fakes. They can be a very valuable educational tool. "Here kids, this is what a Fugio cent felt like!".
|
|
Valued Member
United States
366 Posts |
Still a great story even if it turns out to be a fake or inconclusive.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
Aye the 3 doesn't match at all to a 1943. My vote is for a 1948 that was stomped on concrete for a while.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,409 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/21/2012 11:21 am
