| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,565 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Formerly nancyc
Australia
5385 Posts |
There's a couple things to look for on 2007 20c's. On the Obverse (Queen side), look for a difference in the downstroke of the 7 in the date, thick or thin. On the reverse (Platypus side) look for an almost missing claw on the outside platypus' foot. I'll try & put up some images tomorrow so you know what you're looking for. The coin with the ridge running around the edge might be your best find so far.  It's possible that it could be a reasonably unusual error where the coin is struck partially out of the collar. A close up of the edge of the coin might make identification of the error a bit easier. Is any of the reeding missing? Some info and pictures can be seen here: http://www.australian-threepence.co...-errors.html
life is a mystery to be lived not a problem to be solved
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Yeah...the thick coin got my attention too. More pics please! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
The rim looks pretty high on that one. Almost like a small ramstrike.
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
251 Posts |
im about to take more pic's ill take photos all the way around but the coin has black stuff on it ill just leave as is I don't know how to clean it properly
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
236 Posts |
Hello Candace I have 2 x 2007 20 cents here in front of me.
The edge is reeded but appears to have been reeded over the top of a lightly struck centre ridge. (very light)
The 2 coins are 5 mm thick and appear to be equal so 2.5 mm thick each.
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
251 Posts |
Hi darge I measured this 1997 one it is 3mm thick and 28mm wide so about 1/2mm difference than the norm. My 2007 are same thickness as yours,
|
|
New Member
Australia
24 Posts |
Is that even possible? A normal 2004 20 cent. I have seen any as of yet :(
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
2180 Posts |
Yeah, you find them with the big portrait occasionally. In all my searching, I've found one big portrait 2004 20c.
|
|
New Member
Australia
45 Posts |
Here are a couple of photos of the 2007 thin 7 and thick 7. You can see that the downward stroke of the thin 7 appears slightly longer than that of the thick 7.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
7096 Posts |
Quote: Yeah, you find them with the big portrait occasionally. In all my searching, I've found one big portrait 2004 20c.
this is my best "Pointy A"   
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
251 Posts |
Thank you for the pic's of 2007 eccentric ill have to have a close look to see if thats what I have =D also nice pic's how do you get your coins so lovely and clean admittedly I'm dogie =/ I dont know how to so I just try and clean with soap and water =0
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1119 Posts |
dont try and clean your coins, at most soak them in de mineralized water and pat dry softly with a microfibre cloth, or soak in pure acetone to remove grease and grime. but never rub or try to clean, the hardest effort mine get is water from a squirty bottle
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
4411 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 Australia
251 Posts |
Mmm note to self do not bath coins like I do my children =D
|
|
New Member
Australia
45 Posts |
The 2007 coins are UNC - that's why they appear so clean. I agree with the others - don't routinely clean coins. However, having said that, there are times when a light wash is needed. I have been known to use hot water and detergent to remove dirt. Just a light rub with the fingers usually does the trick. The problem with using this method on some coins, however, is that you often remove the toning or patina that gave the coin its original appearance. What you can end up with is a coin that looks a lot worse that it did before the clean. It's amazing what a bit of toning can conceal - fine, hairline scratches can suddenly appear from nowhere. I must confess to having spoilt a few coins by trying to improve their appearance! I don't do it any more.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,565 |
Page 2 of 2
|