| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,568 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
Okay, I have NO clue what that product actually is, but I would highly recommend you NOT use that on a coin again. Cleaners like that that are not meant for coins will strip the luster off of a coin in half a heart beat. As this coi wasn't worth more than melt anyway, no loss. Had that been a nice MS coin however...
|
|
New Member
 United Kingdom
28 Posts |
Quote:
Cleaners like that that are not meant for coins will strip the luster off of a coin in half a heart beat Absolutely, won't ever use it on an half decent coin. |
|
Valued Member
Canada
271 Posts |
That coin was VERY harshly cleaned, probably before the gold stuff was applied. Looks like it could have been in a cufflink or other novelty item.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1721 Posts |
Quote:
That coin was VERY harshly cleaned Ya think? Soda crystals can be used for scrubbing a bathroom or as Archie Bunker would say, a turlit, but never a coin. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1721 Posts |
An acetone bath may have fixed this without the harsh scrubbing. Look at the side by side of the before and after. Yes, there were some cleaning abrasions but the after is much worse.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8518 Posts |
I think what he was saying is that it was already harshly cleaned so he used that cleaner on a coin that was already just melt value. Kinda like what we all do when we wanna experiment.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1721 Posts |
52Raymo,
Yes, I realize this. I didn't mean any disrespect to calinka. I'm sure some people cringe when they see my coin experiments. All I was showing was the increased scratches from his cleaning. It didn't, in my opinion, make the coin look better, just more scuffed. calinka was offered the advise of using acetone first and chose to scrub instead. He could have used Comet, Ajax, Softscrub, steel wool, sandpaper or any other abrasive and achieved the same effect. Silver value or not, this forum is here to help people and share education as well as keep others from trying this same thing on a more valuable coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
Which is exactly why I said what I said. Not because I really thought calinka would do that to a good coin (but you also never know), but to make sure anyone else reading this knew that there was no way that should be done to a decent coin.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
271 Posts |
Yes, I meant it was already harshly cleaned before he harshly cleaned it. At least he learned a lesson on this coin and not a 1933 double eagle or something! :)
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
28 Posts |
 I know, I know, sorry, . . but not all is lost, my new secret magic mix will bring back my coin to a mint condition again. Mind you, I have to stir it carefully for another week but I am sure it will work. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8518 Posts |
Ha, I knew what you were up to. Most of the guys here have played with improving coins, myself included.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2311 Posts |
Yeah the cleaning really did scratch it. But not really that much, the coin did have some.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3755 Posts |
Actually, I dont think calinkas treatment actually scratched the coin any. There was enough crud on the coin to hide all the scratches from the previous ill treatment it received. So when that harsh cleaner ripped all the crud and any possible luster the coin might have had right off, voila! all the scratches are there to see.
You know what that coin needs? About 6 months in your pocket.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8518 Posts |
I second that ! I would love to see the outcome if you decide to make a pocket piece out of it.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
New Member
United Kingdom
28 Posts |
But what about the weight? 12.36 gr. that seems too low. The diameter is perfect but look at the picture, a 'normal' 64 Kennedy with below this one.  Notice the thickness? |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,568 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/06/2013 10:09 pm
