| Author |
 Replies: 27 / Views: 31,152 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4637 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 Australia
16868 Posts |
The purple stamp on the far left is an Arabic name, "Khalid". Presumably originating from a middle-eastern moneychanger.
Don't say "infinitely" when you mean "very"; otherwise, you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite. - C. S. Lewis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
I think there was a 20 with Jesus stamped on it. Let me find that thread.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2869 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
The stamp looks like it was stamped under the ink on the 100 dollar bill I looked through a loupe and it's under you ink
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5404 Posts |
Merchants stamps attesting to genuineness.
Nothing nefarious going on here .
|
|
Moderator
United States
189969 Posts |
 to the Community, Markcoins23! |
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
The stamp mark on this 2003 series a $100 bill was placed on the paper before it was printed. You can notice the blue ink at the edge of the bill just below the standard and the reverse side right bottom corner. Was it ever a practice for quality control or or inspection purposes stamp paper before printed?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4637 Posts |
Quote:
The stamp mark on this 2003 series a $100 bill was placed on the paper before it was printed. Welcome to CCF, but I respectfully disagree. What you have here is a classic Chopmark. I would highly recommend that you read the thread. Edited by SteveInTampa
05/18/2024 1:00 pm
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
Thank you for your opinion regarding the chop mark. Sharing pics don't always allow you to see what is visible when looked under a microscope. I will repost with a pic from a microscope view so that is visible to you viewers that the stamp was down before the printing began. Hopefully this may lead to the conclusion of its origin thanks again MrGMrG
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4637 Posts |
The Chopmark "appears" to be under the printing because the ink used for the Chopmark doesn't stick to the ink used by the BEP, causing an optical illusion. These Chopmarks consistently fool new collectors. You can read about them here. https://www.coinbooks.org/esylum_v17n07a21.html |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Steve has made this point in the past, abd it is well worth remembering.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4637 Posts |
Don't get me wrong MrG X 2, pre-printed errors are a real thing. However, they almost exclusively appeared on older notes, before computer inspection was being utilized.
Your note is modern, with a classic Chopmark.
|
|
Moderator
United States
189969 Posts |
to the Community, MrGMrG! |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 27 / Views: 31,152 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/15/2021 8:09 pm
