| Author |
 Replies: 32 / Views: 4,473 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
72 Posts |
hummmmmmmmm this looks interesting  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
686 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2781 Posts |
depending how picky you want to be, technically isn't EVERY coin a variety?
I don't get the whole thing either... but to each his own.
personally if it isn't blatantly obvious with the naked eye I don't think I would pay any premium
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2781 Posts |
depending how picky you want to be, technically isn't EVERY coin a variety?
I don't get the whole thing either... but to each his own.
personally if it isn't blatantly obvious with the naked eye I don't think I would pay any premium
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
108 Posts |
jg86, I'm a photographer, and was lucky to have that example to photograph.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
686 Posts |
I was going to comment on how good the pictures were, well done.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
108 Posts |
Thanks... it would have been much easier, and the results much better if I didn't have to go through 2 layers of plastic.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1330 Posts |
jb86 yes it has tripling and I'm still trying to figure this one out..
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
108 Posts |
Regarding the 1955 25c with double die reverse, I was able to image a raw coin without any plastic between the camera and coin:  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
815 Posts |
I don't personally acknowledge unintentional errors for collecting purposes, and I don't seek out varieties to sell unless there is significant demand. IMHO, a minting error does not create a sub category of a given coin. I acknowledge mint marks and years, nothing more (for collecting).
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
154 Posts |
I'm with Anjohl all the way.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
387 Posts |
Quote:
i have this one and I been told its worthless doubling I see no difference between 1955 and this one Based on the guideline developed by the coin collectors in the US the loonie has traits of die related doubling which means it is "good" doubling. That does not automatically translate into worthiness though. That's what I have learnt through hard lessons in collecting. |
|
Valued Member
Canada
387 Posts |
"Popular"
Based on what everyone is seems to be saying I would think appearance without the aid of any magnification is important.
So the one that I do not really get is the:
1974 Winnipeg Dollar with all its varieties. You need a powerful loop to even see some of the differences in these varieties.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
129 Posts |
I really don't get the big deal over double or triple HP on the 1937-39-45 or the 1947 Canadian silver dollars. I would not buy one just for a double or triple HP
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
187 Posts |
While I do understand it, I don't care for the NSF and SF varieties on early Elizabethan coins.
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 32 / Views: 4,473 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 09/06/2013 9:44 pm
