| Author |
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,760 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3167 Posts |
I'm going MS65.
FadeToBlack, what camera did you use to take that picture?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18706 Posts |
I think ANACS graded this at MS65..really nice pics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 1751 Posts |
Canon T2i with a Tamron 272E 90mm macro lens.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I'm going to say it's no more than a MS-64. I think there is too much chatter in obverse fields and just a little too much on the cheek to make 65.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
I think they graded it a 64.
However, it would have a shot at a 65 if you resubmit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 1751 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
I never would have guessed 63 based on the initial photos.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
339 Posts |
63 seems conservative, but the value difference for 64 is very small, I bet that toning adds more value than the 64 would have. Nicely toned Morgans get bid really high on ebay...
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Well bought FTB. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3167 Posts |
Wow, that ones gotta be undergraded. That camera and lens must make a really good pair, that picture is beautiful and shows a ton of detail! Nice coin! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18706 Posts |
IMO the coin is undergraded
|
|
New Member
United States
17 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
17 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 22 / Views: 2,760 |
Page 2 of 2
|