| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 2,168 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
MS63+ this one isn't far from a MS64, just a touch too many marks on the cheek.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8521 Posts |
Quote:
I haven't taken a close look at it for VAMing yet, will do that now since I've got nothing better to do. I thought you just got married...  Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 1751 Posts |
Back to work already. Delayed honeymoon to save money, we're going to Italy sometime in the spring.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
I think it makes 64 with some ease, here's a quick cell shot that doesn't magnify the problems....  |
|
Previously Banned Member
78 Posts |
The second picture does appear to suggest ms64 but the magnified picture shows way to many surface marks to quality it for ms64 not that it really matters 63 or 64 both are pretty common. Carson City Morgans are my favorites thats for sure.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Quote:
The second picture does appear to suggest ms64 but the magnified picture shows way to many surface marks to quality it for ms64 not that it really matters 63 or 64 both are pretty common. Carson City Morgans are my favorites thats for sure. You have to remember that is larger than life size. If I blow that image up on my 13" Macbook and hold the coin next to it, it's something like 20x larger than the real coin. We'll see when it gets sent in. Probably won't be until near Christmas, but I'm confident this sucker is a 64. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
That second picture says MS 64 to me. This is why I am awful at grading Morgans. Very nice coin - I still stand by that statement  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
I think it could grade MS-64 but no more.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
Yep from the second set of pictures I'd say MS64 now. Cheek is very clean.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Glad to see y'all agreeing with me now... my high res pics are designed to highlight and expose flaws. One of these days I'll shoot a super-high grade coin under it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
Just make sure it is another CC Morgan (please!) |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Quote:
Just make sure it is another CC Morgan (please!) A 66 or 67 CC Morgan? Do you want to contribute to that cause? lol. I'd need a second mortgage on my nonexistent house to buy one of those unless I get very, very lucky. EDIT: If somebody here has one and wants it imaged, just let me know, I'll do it free of charge. Edited by FadeToBlack
09/25/2013 7:13 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,168 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/24/2013 5:08 pm
