| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,734 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
If you were posting pictures itd basically be to ask for help grading it or because you wanted too. Ask long as you make sure the picture isn't Geotagged or giving away where you live theres not really a right or wrong answer to your question.
For that year out of over 5,000 graded PCGS only has 2 MS 68, 42 MS 67, and 226 MS 66 for what its worth.
|
|
Valued Member
 100 Posts |
ok, so here they are. I opened the holder ever so carefully and took the pictures and then screwed it back shut, ididnt notice until AFTER I took the pictures that it got some dust on it. The white spots are dust. The back is flawless, the front has a scratch down by her hair, there are 2 small rubs on her nose and a minor light scuff in front of her nose. lets see what you think?    the sucker is seriously locked up behind alarms and in a TL30, I am not worried about that, I was more curious if making it publicly known harmed the value mlgdave Edited by mlgdave
09/30/2013 04:24 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3453 Posts |
I cannot comment on grade but posting the pictures should not harm any value.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Looks like a proof more than a business strike.
If it were mine I'd have it slabbed just for the peace of mind.
(I'm VERY pro slab for better coins.)
|
|
Valued Member
100 Posts |
yep, I am sending it in for grading and slabbing, its definitely a beauty. Right now its in a plastic 3 piece holder screwed together with plastic screws. It has I beleive lexan covers on each side
mlgdave
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
It does look like a coin worth submitting for grading. If it's been polished, someone did a super job of it. It could be a proof.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Ehhhh those images... You make the surfaces look proofish, but the strike doesn't look proof... cleaned.
|
|
Valued Member
100 Posts |
I promise you it has not been cleaned, I have been drooling over it through the microscope for days. my picture quality I know is hard to determine its original luster but I will re take the photos and enhance the contrast and lower the glare
mlgdave
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Yeah, less glare would be great. Take it out in the sunlight on a nice cloudy day for ideal pictures. At any rate, the tics and scratches on the face will keep it to at least a 6... and that would be a touch generous imho.
Still thinking it's been polished or something, though... no offense. I'll wait off on better pics before saying for sure one way or the other.
Edited by FadeToBlack
09/30/2013 6:23 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
 If I were you I would pack that thing up and send it off to PCGS  with kanga, it might be a proof |
|
Valued Member
100 Posts |
It has been sent off to PCGS already, I got the diamond membership so I also sent off 8 of my uncirc 1964D Kennedy d/d for grading
mlgdave
|
|
Valued Member
United States
291 Posts |
Looks like a 65, but that haze has me worried that it has no luster. Hopefully it's just the picture.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
Though the pictures are very hard to grade from, I think I can make out enough marks on the jaw and the fields that I think a 67 or 68 would be unlikely. A 66 could be possible but my feeling is it's more likely to be in the 64 or 65 area if it grades problem free. Best of luck!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
This is out of my area of expertise, but it's an interesting thread. Good Luck with the Submission, and  to CCF |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Any more than a single light source helps to hide nicks and scratches.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,734 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/30/2013 04:23 am
