| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 3,371 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
I couldn't make out any denticles either vinnie.
Machin's issues are probably my weakest area of Colonial Numismatics..I've been wrong before :-)
Diagnostically speaking, the reverse has the tell tale signs of a possible 17-87B...from what I can tell.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4897 Posts |
Just that the date looks odd for a Machins...just corrosion? Any chance it is From NYC Brasher and Bailey?
I really wish colonialjohn (Lorenzo) would input in these threads. We ALL could learn a bunch from him.
Edited by amida17
11/23/2013 8:15 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
The date of 1787 narrows it down to 5 Vlack-numbered Machins reverses (well, 4 really). I was looking at 87b as well, v. It comes close, but I don't think close enough. We may just have another anonymous British or American Bungtown imitation halfpenny here.
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
It definitely looks underweight for a regal that's for sure.
Many British made counterfeits exist as well..may be what this is.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1053 Posts |
Aww... For 10 cents it's still cool.
|
|
Moderator
United States
15537 Posts |
P & V have spoken ... appears the consensus is indeterminate on this example.
I would have for sure snagged it for 10 cents.
David
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art |
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
A, P, & V
:-)
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
How the devil do you guys do this? If it were a Morgan and you asked me for an attribution, I'd laugh hysterically.
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
It's a secret amongst Colonial zealots.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
Don't count me out yet! My attentions are divided between this and gnocchi with Gorgonzola sauce!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
Here's the shoulder mail on Xavier's coin, followed by the Vlack 17 obverse. The position of the mail segments relative to each other do appear to be a match. Vermontensium appears to have had the right idea with Vlack 17-87b.   I'm thinking the areas I was looking at on the reverse may have been altered by corrosion. I'll look for some matching diagnostics in other places. |
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
I was also looking at the mail p but was primarily going off diagnostics of the reverse as it was the only die for 17-87B. The spacing of the date, shield and dot placement pretty much made me go with 87-B and you matching up the mail pretty much confirms it. Not bad for a dime  swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
Not bad at all! Probably among the best bargains posted on the forum, excluding coins acquired by theft!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2589 Posts |
Thank you all! Its amazing you folks could pin this thing down with so much corrosion. I didn't expect this to be attributable at all lol. From what I'm reading this is one of the more common varieties. What might this puppy fetch at auction? All of the hammer prices I've seen are for coins in much better shape than this one. The cheapest I saw was an XF on heritage go for $700 something dollars.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3229 Posts |
Holy cow what a junk bin find! Congrats!  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 3,371 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/23/2013 8:13 pm
