| Author |
 Replies: 33 / Views: 3,547 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
239 Posts |
I would buy the MS63 crack it out of its holder and resubmit it
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3343 Posts |
Nobody ever circulates a commem! A great pocket piece, but not my first choice for $65. Any number of rarer gouged and worn coins out there. I guess I'd take the MS coin and stick it in my pocket, maybe 50 years from now it would look like the 1892.
"Two minutes ago I would have sold my chances for a tired dime." Fred Astaire
|
|
New Member
United States
16 Posts |
The FR-02, then crack it and keep it in my pocket for about 3 months to make it a PO-01.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
quote:
Nobody ever circulates a commem!
I would have to disagree with that. Modern commems may not circulate, but the older commems saw alot of circulation. A non-pocketpiece FR-02 might be a bit of a stretch but I have seen plenty of VF-XFs. Columbians that didnt sell at the Chicago Fair for $1 were dumped into circulation at face value afterwards and many saw quite a bit of circulation. Many of the more common commems also spent quite a bit of time in commerce. |
|
Valued Member
United States
157 Posts |
This is the insanity of the PCGS "Low Ball" registry. Personally I think it's irresponsible to reward lower grades with more registry points, because I believe we should be preserving our coins for the future generations of collectors, not intentionally wearing them down for more registry points. It's just another gimmick of many that the slabbers are using to get more coins slabbed that don't need slabbing. And unlike other gimmicks used to encourage more submissions, this one DIRECTLY encourages ruining coins.
Edited by ziggy29
07/23/2007 1:03 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2443 Posts |
I agree with ziggy, plus I think some of the PCGS registry people have too much time and money on there hands.
|
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
This is the first I have heard of the "lowball registry set" concept. Can someone elaborate on what this is and how it works? Not knowing anything except what I have just read here, it does sound like a ploy from the grading firms to get more submissions from coins that would otherwise not be graded.
|
|
New Member
United States
9 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1454 Posts |
registry, smegistry, bah, just another way to take the fun out of collecting coins, what a shame.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2269 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
57 Posts |
quote:
This is the first I have heard of the "lowball registry set" concept. Can someone elaborate on what this is and how it works? Not knowing anything except what I have just read here, it does sound like a ploy from the grading firms to get more submissions from coins that would otherwise not be graded.
PCGS runs a "Set Registry" (online here: http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/ ). Here you can register your various sets, and get it scored based on completeness and quality of the coins in set. They have a category for low-ball sets where you get points for the lower the quality. I think your comment on it sounds about right to me.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1231 Posts |
The MS coin and if its in a slab it wouldn't be for long
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2443 Posts |
Sagan, I know people collect it for the registry, but that's about it. In 10 years, I don't think they will hold there value much (hey but you never know, right?). What is the purpose of having a registry set, other than showing off the coins you have? Is it like a contest or something? If so, it makes more sense as to why people are buying these.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1283 Posts |
quote:
With the recent inception of the PCGS "Low-Ball" Registry Sets came a new new found love for low graded PCGS slabs. PO01-AG03 are now selling at a premium.
Wow, that's crazy! |
|
New Member
United States
11 Posts |
I would really go for the MS coin because its only $5 more.im surprised the little money difference between thoose 2 coins.But I also agree with BRUCE 1947 about liking a little wear on a coin
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 33 / Views: 3,547 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 07/20/2007 2:22 pm
