| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 2,147 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9796 Posts |
MS63 - since it has a green bean sticker on it. It looks like a pretty close MS64 but at a MS64 grade I'm not sure this would qualify for a CAC green bean. It does look quite lustrous however, and the photos could be playing tricks on my eyes, the scuff marks may be only that scuff, and not digs or hits, so MS64 might be the call, I'll stick to MS63 CAC.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
Beautiful coin, but I'm gonna be a little tough looking at the "Y" in "LIBERTY" - 62.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
Looks like a good candidate for MS64 beaned,
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
I am split between MS63 & 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1554 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1511 Posts |
Beaned I'm in at 63... But a 64 wouldn't suprise me at all, the fields are quite clean in front of the face.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 13014 Posts |
Putting this in bold to make it easier to find.
PCGS gave it a MS 65, CAC gave it green beanQuote:
It does look quite lustrous however, and the photos could be playing tricks on my eyes, the scuff marks may be only that scuff, and not digs or hits Nice observation. Most of that cheek stuff is in fact digital photography brutalness where its just less lustrous and not bag marks. The luster is pretty insane, I'm not a big morgan guy but it would stand out compared to a good number of ones I've seen in person.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
hard to judge from pics but looks beautiful either way!
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
If it beaned at at 65 your photos were rough on it. I'll bet it's a real looker in hand.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote:
If it beaned at at 65 your photos were rough on it They absolutely are. The cheek loves to look beat up in pictures when its really not. I was actually surprised to see that looking at the pics. In all honesty it probably wasnt the best coin to pick for this given how it photographs |
|
Moderator
 United States
15555 Posts |
Wow indeed ... PCGS MS65/CAC is better that I would have guessed given the photos.
Nice coin indeed.
David
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,147 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/07/2014 12:02 am
