| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 3,611 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
716 Posts |
I agree with MS 62. I don't see any wear, some slight strike weakness on reverse and somewhat lacking in luster. But all in all, a really nice FE.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7643 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8521 Posts |
MS63
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10045 Posts |
Nice MS FE! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
432 Posts |
I am going with MS63. Nice coin Moe!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
I'm just going to widen the range here and say AU-58 for fun
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1081 Posts |
I am thinking AU55, the fields, especially on the obverse don't look original, but again, could be the lighting.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1096 Posts |
MS63 all day long. Beauty.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Nice one Moe..  MS-63 for me. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
Moe, very nice coin!! Great details, definitely MS. Just not sure on originality. I'd say either MS-62 or UNC details.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
160 Posts |
MS61
Edited by JRG 02/26/2014 5:27 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3283 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
I agree with great detail on this coin, hence my purchase. A number of you all commented on the "possible non-original" surfaces. Good call! Slab: 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 3,611 |
Page 2 of 2
|