| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,127 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Au50
Slight flatness due to wear on Lib's hair, right knee, (obv.), leading edge of wing and breast feathers (rev.),
Some residual luster, clean rims and no other problems.
I wish I was lucky enough to have a type 1 as nice as this!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
AU-53, but worth a premium for eye appeal. This is an exceptionally nice example, one of the nicest AUs I have seen in a while.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
308 Posts |
I'm with Joseph7420 on this AU53 with No full head. A little too much ware for any higher, but lots a good luster. Very nice coin, I like!!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
274 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I can see a 55 for shear eye appeal, even if the wear indicates a lower grade. I'd pay 55 money for it all day long. Are you going to keep it in the slab? Or are you putting it in an album? This would look beautiful in a 7070.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
274 Posts |
I am going to leave this one in the slab.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I think they have over graded it.
Compare PCGS photograde images for AU50 and AU55.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
274 Posts |
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. PCGS graded it and CAC endorsed it, so...........
|
|
Valued Member
United States
308 Posts |
Yeah that endorsement seals the deal. I said AU53 but it can only be if that slab says so. Such a nice coin!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
274 Posts |
To be honest, I don't care if the slab said 50 or 55. I bought it for the eye appeal, and I paid 55 money for it. My point was that there were several expert graders that looked at this coin and agreed it is a 55.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
Quote:
I think they have over graded it.
Compare PCGS photograde images for AU50 and AU55. yeah, however there are a bunch of characteristics which to judge a coin by, and the AU-50 they use is a 1916. Edited by johnny54321
03/21/2014 11:14 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
118 Posts |
Au50 would have been my guess. Seems a lot of the high points have just touch of wear.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,127 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/20/2014 02:06 am
