| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,916 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
using the shield and reverse legend I come up with VG8. nlp
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3167 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
The 1927-s slq is graded to a whole different standard than other slqs....mostly because they are known for exceptionally weak strikes. Normally I would call a coin like this G-4 with a shot at 6...but being a 1927-s; its a VG.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
231 Posts |
G-6 but it looks cleaned doesn't it?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
Joseph, why are you posting so much?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
^^^^^^^ Huh? ^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I have a suspicion that the rolling and blanking for these may be a little inconsistent, inasmuch as there may be hard and soft areas on the blanks, which gives rise to the observation that some areas wear at different rates on the same area on differnt coins.
This will result in different grading opinions, when we look at different areas of the coin , rather than the same areas.
That would make the '27s SLQ harder to grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1823 Posts |
Quote:
Joseph, why are you posting so much? @ Cruisinfusion why would you ask that for  it's none of your bees wax. Well I say g 6 |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1002 Posts |
I'm leaning toward VG08 for the OP coin in this particular date, much nicer in person with a decent patina. -Very slightly more detail than another 27-S SLQ I have which I think is G06 : JMHO -Ron Appreciate the input, always an education here   Edited by Night-Hawk
03/30/2014 7:08 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Obverse Vg-08
Reverse G-06
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1028 Posts |
yes, I think the coin is a VG-8 considering the date.
This is about as much of a condition rarity as you'll ever see. Even more so than the prices would suggest. This coin is probably currently over-valued in lower circulated grades, such as this one unfortunately, and such pieces are really a dime a dozen. Then, try finding this date in a high grade.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,916 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/30/2014 10:11 am
