| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,808 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
I think it's probably in an NGC 55 (possibly 58) holder. I'd grade it 50.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21667 Posts |
Looks good to me. I'll go with MS60.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
Slight but obvious wear on the high points, both sides. No other problems with this coin. AU55, or EF in the British system.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Nice one zx... I'll say AU-55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
ICCS ef40, maybe an ef45.
NGC ef45 or au50 (and possibly higher).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1049 Posts |
That's a beaut, some bag marks, a nice coin edge mark above the date, not seeing any mint lustre, yet I still lean towards 60 and having a tough time to discount it for wear from that.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9874 Posts |
EF45 Too much wear on the reverse for AU
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
Edited by DBM 10/11/2014 11:34 am
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
403 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
972 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1505 Posts |
NGC grade AU55 or 58 ICCS grade : not better than AU 50, just MO
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
 I want to see what NGC gave it!!:)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5417 Posts |
Oops. My bad. I totally forgot.
NGC gave it an XF-45, which I think is spot on. ICCS would probably give it XF-40 or XF-45 IMO.
I was pretty surprised that so many of you gave it AU and even MS.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,808 |
Page 2 of 2
|