| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,395 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
65, but the spots bother me a bit.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
In a rattler? 65. Real grade? Easy 66.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2373 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
506 Posts |
The details look 66 to me but the spotting might lower it to 65
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
167 Posts |
Rattlers in 65 were $500 coins back then. I'll say 65 too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
Looks like a 65 by today's standards. I'm hoping you grabbed that one in a 64 rattler slab.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1213 Posts |
It's looks 65-ish to me also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
It's a 66 in a rattler. That one as a 65 would have been cracked years ago.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1370 Posts |
So this one I ended up getting as part of a trade for this coin.    The rattler is:  I feel that the PCGS rattler coin is actually a better coin than the NGC 66 in hand ....much cleaner
|
|
Valued Member
United States
416 Posts |
I agree with you the 65 looks better than the 66 you traded. I really like it.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Wow. You can consider that one to already have the gold bean on it.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,395 |
Page 2 of 2
|