| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,484 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
G06 nice original look  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3486 Posts |
I would call this a solid good. G-4.
The reverse has a complete though weak rim which is often absent on G-4 Barbers.
To push it a half-grade higher ... not my style but the "L" of liberty is there.
I would NOT call it a VG-8 but I can live with a Good-6 grade.
And most definitely an original coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36901 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7641 Posts |
There is nothing about this coin that warrants a "NET" grade that I can see. Am I missing something?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3184 Posts |
Rim ding at 2:00  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7641 Posts |
Looks like a carbon spot on my monitor. Need to get my eyes checked!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3184 Posts |
Do you guys think this coin is worthy of a PCGS slab?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
108 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3486 Posts |
The short answer to slabbing (PCGS or otherwise) this coin is 'no.'
While a tough date and mint, examples in this grade are usually seen unslabbed.
It would not be cost effective to slab.
A 2X2 or a plastic flip will protect it. And protect it you should.
But I see nothing to be gained from spending money on a coin that we all agree is a nice, original example.
A potential buyer in this grade would want it for an album most likely.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,484 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/22/2015 4:34 pm
