| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 14,311 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1045 Posts |
For coin #3 IF we can assume that these two assumptions are actually true
#1) There is "K" in the mint mark
#2) There is a "Delta" fieldmark behind the bust
THEN we can say this is:
Constantius Gallus, Cyzicus mint, RIC 99
Edited by Biancasdad
03/24/2015 10:56 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
72 Posts |
I think you are correct with coin number 3, I looked at it a bit closer, and the delta fieldmark is there, it's much easier to see in person than in the picture. And the mintmark appears to be SMK, again easier to tell when I look again in person rather than in the picture.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts |
Just wanted to add a thank you for helping. I'm hoping to try to start picking up some more ancient coins again and hopefully I'll be able to contribute some more to this forum.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1045 Posts |
You are very welcome and please feel free to post anything and everything as our members are diverse in nature and giving in spirit, and by the way....  |
|
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts |
Here's one more that might be a long shot because of the condition. I'm only posting a picture of the front because the back doesn't have anything that I could get to show up in a picture. What I was able to get from the back is that it is from the Cyzicus mint.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Italy
1790 Posts |
It from "Emperor" Honorius. Looks like an AE-2 from the 390's
|
|
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts |
Thanks, another emperor to learn about, as I'm identifying these I'm trying to look up a bit about each of the emperors. It's been pretty interesting hopefully I'll be able to learn enough to identify them on my own before too long.
I'm thinking I might get another batch of uncleaned coins before too long to see if I can get any of the better condition ones on my own.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts |
If you guys don't mind I'm going to post one more to check and see if I got the emperor right. I'm thinking this one is another Constans, as the portrait looks similar to the first coin that I posted. Unfortunately I haven't figured out how to get all the detail that you can see in hand into the picture, but hopefully the picture is good enough for someone to tell me if I'm right or wrong on it.  Also how do you recognize the emperors when you can't read the name on the coin? Is there an easy to use reference somewhere to skim through and try to match the portrait, or is it just from seeing enough of them you start to recognize the different ones? |
|
Pillar of the Community
Spain
629 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts |
As I do a bit more research I think the Constans that I just posted is this one. http://www.coinproject.com/coin_det...?coin=296257At least from what I can tell of the back it is correct, although I'm not sure if I got the correct mint as most of the mint mark is missing on mine, and from the little bit (one letter) that I can see of it it looks like the middle letter of the mint mark is a T, and with a very good amount of imagination there might be part of an S after it. Based on the size of the letter I think that the T is the middle letter of a 3 letter mintmark. Any ideas of what mint it could be from that, or am I probably just misreading the one letter as a T since it is in bad shape? |
|
Pillar of the Community
Spain
629 Posts |
TS?
THESSALONICA mint in greece
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Spain
629 Posts |
There is a very interesting book about ancient roman coins for begginers.
It´s quite Cheap and has been writed by an argentinian scholar Damian R. Salgado. The title is "Monedas Romanas. el bajo imperio (294-498 d.j.c.)".
My son says that this book "...is a massive attribution weapon".
I know that is in spanish (and english), but is the best to attribute a coin.
It has been printed by "letra viva editorial. division numismática"
|
|
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts |
Quote:
TS?
THESSALONICA mint in greece That probably is it, and if not then the mark is probably too damaged to be able to figure it out. All the other coins seem to be from the Balkans, and it seems reasonable that a coin from Thessalonica could have made it up to that area. |
|
Valued Member
United States
72 Posts |
Quote:
There is a very interesting book about ancient roman coins for begginers.
It´s quite Cheap and has been writed by an argentinian scholar Damian R. Salgado. The title is "Monedas Romanas. el bajo imperio (294-498 d.j.c.)".
My son says that this book "...is a massive attribution weapon".
I know that is in spanish (and english), but is the best to attribute a coin.
It has been printed by "letra viva editorial. division numismática" Sounds like it might be interesting to look at whenever I decide to get some more uncleaned coins if I can find the english version. As it is I think I'm about out of unattributed coins that have any hope of being attributed. |
|
Pillar of the Community
Spain
629 Posts |
You have an invaluable resource in this forum... https://goccf.com/t/149883&whichpage=1You can find there the link to the page "Tesorillo" with a very useful tool to identify reverse types and coins of several emperors... ...and my friend MAPILA made an "english version" too. Easy and quick. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 14,311 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 03/24/2015 10:55 pm
