| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 3,298 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1414 Posts |
The real deal is an 1861 Paquet Reverse which would be worth hundreds of thousands or a million dollars, so yeah, fake. Jeff
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1414 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
That is a really bad fake. How are you associated with it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1512 Posts |
Does it stick to a magnet?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
Quote:
It's fake. Yes. Yes it is. Edited by SilverStackerKid
06/05/2015 03:05 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
The face just screams fake too fat of a face
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1748 Posts |
Yup, unfortunately she's fake. hope you didn't pay too much for it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
946 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
212 Posts |
Liberty looks too chubby here. Fake.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
62 Posts |
That's a very cheap fake, how did you get it?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4963 Posts |
I have followed this thread for a while, and am suspecting that the OP may have forgotten to hit 'subscribe'.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
331 Posts |
a paquet reverse wasn't made in proof and no gold piece I have seen has this DPL finish except on proofs which this isn't
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote:
a paquet reverse wasn't made in proof That is true for the San Francisco business strikes but it was made in proof on the two Philadelphia pattern pieces. Note this doesn't have an S mintmark. It's intended to be one of the pattern pieces.....but it is still a fake. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,298 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/04/2015 1:15 pm
