| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 1,897 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
I see some slight wear, but don't know if it's actual wear, might just be the toning. I'll say AU-58 to be safe.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1949 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Not a touch of rub on lower and center shield or knee on obverse; nor wing centers, tips, or breast. No sign of luster breaks. Single noticeable hit on Reverse, rest only minor or well hidden bag marks. MS 63 and not too terribly far from FH.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll stick my neck out and say 64FH. Beautiful example!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18681 Posts |
I'm going with MS64 also. Not sure about FH. Looks close
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Put me down for MS63FH.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7375 Posts |
Tough to grade with toning. An expert recently told me that if I could learn to grade toned coins, I'd make a lot of money. Don't think that'll ever happen. Horrible pic of coin, just for slab id.  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Missed it by 1 but got the FH right! Yay me :)
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Crack it and send it to PCGS, I'm sure they'll give it a 63FH
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Not sure which pic shows the more-or-less correct color. I can only assume there must be considerable surface marks under the toning for this to merit only a 62. The difference in vvalue between 62FH and 63FH probably doesn't justify resubmitting it.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
278 Posts |
My grade is MS63FH. The break in luster on the knee/leg is what gives it 63 and not 64. I think NGC was alittle conservative on this one. Beautiful SLQ type 1 btw!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 1,897 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/10/2015 11:26 am
