| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,456 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
To me, the luster looks pretty good, just my opinion. I'd say 63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1949 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18681 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
Using this coin as the example how can one tell, in general, if the absence of well defined breast feathers is the result of wear or a weak strike? I have always had issues with IDing this condition correctly.
If this is a weak strike, the grade is 63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36800 Posts |
Quote:
Using this coin as the example how can one tell, in general, if the absence of well defined breast feathers is the result of wear or a weak strike? I have always had issues with IDing this condition correctly. On this coin it is not the strike that determines MS-63, it's the amount of bag marks. |
|
Valued Member
United States
246 Posts |
Looks MS62 to me...
Too flat on chest feathers and center of obverse, and bag marks hold it back from 63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Great eye-appeal. Assuming good luster, have seen worse in 64 slabs. Cannot be less than 63.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Agree with all who said solid 63. Nice looking Morgan!  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,456 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/12/2015 3:36 pm
