| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,554 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Slightest luster breaks and only the smallest indication of rub at the very highest points of the design keep this from a high MS grade. As shown, I'd agree with the AU-58 assessment. Too bad because the lack of abrasions or bag marks (particularity on the reverse) is outstanding.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
AU-58, I don't really see any wear, but there is very little luster present, and there are breaks in luster as well.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Certainly it's either a 58 or a 64. Beautiful specimen.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
AU55/58 to me beyond the luster breaks, I don't see too many bad marks, just one little spot/ding on the reverse @ 9:00. Love to see sharper focused photos. That is a nice coin.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
I think all saint gaudens double eagles are nice, no matter what condition they're in.  AU-55 Edited by CoinCollector2012
07/12/2015 10:39 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
Quote:
I think all saint gaudens double eagles are nice, no matter what condition they're in.
AU-55 What about this one?   |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
I think the coin would grade AU-58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
Using Photograde as a guide, I had this at AU-58 which seems to be what several here were thinking.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36826 Posts |
AU-55 can't tell if the surfaces are original from these photos.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I officially rescind my opinion of authenticity. I took a closer look at this one after seeing the two Seated dollars you posted, and I believe this coin is a counterfeit, although still made of gold. All of the circled marks are depressions from contact marks were transfered from the host coin to the counterfeit die, a classic diagnostic of counterfeits. My first impressions were that the coin looked too "clean," but now I think it is counterfeit.  |
|
New Member
 Norway
44 Posts |
Thanks all! The source of this coin is completely different from the Liberty Seated dollars. When I found out that there were not minted any 1862-O seated liberties, the other one would obviously also be a fake one. This one however, is from a local coin dealer. So I don't know/think this one is fake, although everyone can make mistakes. Glad I didn't buy any of them just because they looked "alright" :) |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I could still be wrong. Gold is hard to authenticate from photos.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,554 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/12/2015 2:39 pm
