| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 4,063 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
And exactly how can we help you?  Nice work!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
Best pics I have seen. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 To CCF, an extremely sharp Morgan, clean face and fields. IMHO--MS-67. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
403 Posts |
Coinfrog, I am looking for points to improve on, photography-wise.
Thanks.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
118 Posts |
Beautiful pictures! You should let us in on how you accomplished these images! Great job, probably one of the best photos I have seen on CCF.....and 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
Nice pictures, but maybe something to diffuse and spread the light evenly  many use light reflected off a surface (usually white paper) or some shine through white plastic
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Woah.  Would cause stellar results on ebay. I must say, Good Job! Much better than I can do.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9395 Posts |
These pictures are great -- lots of luster plus no burned out highlights at the same time.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Nice pics, but not perfect. You have room to improve in a few areas: - Overall the image is a bit dark, yet this is masked by the high contrast and bright highlight areas. I'd suggest reducing contrast a little either in-camera or post. This will brighten the shadows a bit and even-out the overall image - I'm not fond of the 3-light presentation on highly-lustrous cartwheel coins. An X-pattern is more pleasing and once you lower contrast a bit you'll be able to bring up the darker areas so a 3rd light is not needed. If you really need extra light to bring up the dark areas, a white reflector/diffuser may work better. - You are probably sharpening a bit too much. This is often to personal taste but especially for high contrast and lustrous coins sharpening needs to be done super carefully. - Overall, the luster is a bit over the top. The coin may have this much or even more luster, but it is obscuring detail that is important for grading. A bit (more?) of diffusion will balance this and brighten the light areas as well. - You have both areas of under- and over-exposure. Reducing contrast a bit will help this, as would reducing your exposure a bit using exposure compensation or other methods. Blowing out silver coins is not as big an issue as copper or heavily-toned coins, but it's still not advised. Here are the lost shadows and highlights. Not too bad but better to have fewer if possible:   - Side-by-side is nice but the presentation is too small. better to make the images larger. Standard here and on other forums is 800x800 for each obverse and reverse. This makes it better to put the images top-bottom so they will be large enough to see details for grading and better appreciation of the coin. All the above said, I agree with other's comments that the images are pretty good already. Just a little tweaking and you're there.
Edited by rmpsrpms 07/30/2015 11:19 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
940 Posts |
You already are better at this. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3194 Posts |
If those are your first attempts, keep going! Great info to be had here in this forum. Great folks who are extremely knowledgeable.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1037 Posts |
It looks like your on the right track. It is a little tricky to take quality coin pictures. But with anything, it takes practice to get better.
What kind of setup are you using?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2850 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9395 Posts |
-
Edited by pepactonius 08/15/2015 12:05 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Hmm, what's going on here?
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 4,063 |
Page 2 of 2
|