| Author |
Replies: 34 / Views: 3,474 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12057 Posts |
Nicely done, Cascade, and you definitely know your way around the Morgan series!
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
I was only off by one, so I don't feel too bad, nice coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Very nice looking Morgan for the grade. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12057 Posts |
If it could get a -64 it would be a mega-jump in price but I'm not about to risk it.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
I would have said MS-64 DMPL. wicked coin!! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12057 Posts |
I think too much chatter in the fields for a 64. I don't think it would upgrade.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3204 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
I was going to lean more twards 64 but the strike is a little weak maybe thats what held it to a 63.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
That strike is virtually as good as it gets, you can almost see complete lines of hair over the ear, at the second highest point on the obverse. That's a tough thing to find on business strikes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
 It's the stupid field chatter that did it in. On pl morgans the eye goes to the fields first as well as the cheek so the fields are just as important to the grade assessment, if not more so.
Edited by Cascade 09/10/2015 10:05 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
Quote: It's the stupid field chatter that did it in. On pl morgans the eye goes to the fields first as well as the cheek so the fields are just as important to the grade assessment, if not more so. I was just going to post this. With PL and DMPL coins, the fields need to be very clean to start making their way into upper grades. Looks like a solid 63, great coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12057 Posts |
Finally got it today, bad seller sent via fedex without my permission causing a 4 day delay (fedex is terrible.) Took a couple quick snap shots at work. Really does have super deep mirrors, at least as good as my other -63DMPL. I'm sending it off to Todd soon, probably.  
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6394 Posts |
I think PCGS was a bit strict, the coin has eye appeal to burn and field marks on a DMPL Morgan are always more visible than on a normal frosty-luster coin. If graded on another day it might have gotten that MS-64DMPL.
Hey, maybe it's worth trying for CAC approval!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12057 Posts |
I'll be at ANA 2016 here in Dallas area in March so I might take it by CAC's tables and let them have at it. I took two days off work just to attend the show, so I'll have plenty of time to burn. (Not like I need an excuse to take a mini-vacation when I work 70 hour weeks.) If Todd is going to be out there I may just wait until then to get the pictures done since I have a few other higher end coins that also need the great BluCC photo skills to really come alive.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 34 / Views: 3,474 |
Page 3 of 3
|