| Author |
 Replies: 28 / Views: 2,829 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4409 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
Not weakly struck at all, look at those scales on the toes, maybe just a tad weak hair above the ears but not bad. I going with 65 or 65+ and just a nice 79 no pl.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
So what is the grade?
Edited by CartwheelCollector
09/19/2015 11:34 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1512 Posts |
Sorry for the delay! Here is the reveal! This is my new favorite coin!  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
OK, I had the number was missed the DPL, I had it at PL. Beautiful coin. Will be sending mine in eventually.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1512 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
Very nice I think its better than 64
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Under graded numerically in my opinion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
932 Posts |
 It is a stunner! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Hi Matt, Not to take the thread sideways, but since you asked, here's the original ebay listing of my 1880 S. It's already got a 65/65, but I don't think ANACS used the PL/DMPL back then. Am looking forward to resubmitting it and hoping for DMPL. It's my nicest Morgan and looks really nice in hand. Am considering sending it to BluCC photos before resubmission. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1880-s-Morg...p=true&rt=nc |
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
That is one I would have to see in-hand, the images don't scream DPL to me. The new image however, certainly shows why the coin is a 64 and no better, the numerous marks and frost breaks on the cheek certainly hold it back.
Edweather, I think your coin is likely a MS64PL at best, it might not even get the PL designation from PCGS these days, as any cartwheel luster (see the reverse image) is generally a pretty big hurdle to overcome by modern PL/DMPL standards.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 28 / Views: 2,829 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 09/18/2015 11:33 pm
