| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 1,606 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
311 Posts |
It doesn't have any file marks though, the side looks good. It weighs 10.83 grams but I think that's right on considering the wear it's suppose to be 12 grams. It's a lil smaller then my 1878 seated half, did they change size?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
311 Posts |
I would call it a VG-10, not all of the letters in LIBERTY are clearly visible and the rim isn't complete (whether that is from filing or from wear)
|
|
Valued Member
United States
311 Posts |
Even at VG-10 $30 is a good deal....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6398 Posts |
Don't know about filed edges but the denticles do seem unusually narrow on both sides. That could be caused by grinding the edges in which case the reeding should be gone.
Detail otherwise looks F-12 or 15. Color is a bit dark but surfaces could still be original. $30 for an original Seated half in Fine seems like a good deal.
Edited by Jaobler
01/22/2016 4:01 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I have NEVER seen rims that thin on a SLH. And a weight discrepancy of 1.2g seems WAY too much even for this grade.
The file marks could have worn down over the 100 years since it was filed to scrounge up some silver. Is there still reeding? Can you take a quick picture of the edge?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
311 Posts |
This is the side without denticles  |
|
Valued Member
United States
311 Posts |
And I agree there is something going on with the denticles. I've never seen one like this either.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Ha! Someone filed the silver off the edge and was audacious enough to put "reeding" back on the edge so that no one noticed. Very cool piece of history you have there!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
That's probably correct. Interesting coin but definitely not right.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
Gradewise better than VG. F12
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5828 Posts |
VG Details, uhhhh damaged?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Quote:
It doesn't have any file marks though, the side looks good. It weighs 10.83 grams but I think that's right on considering the wear it's suppose to be 12 grams. It's a lil smaller then my 1878 seated half, did they change size? No size change. If it only weighs 10.83 grams you have a problem coin for sure. Nominal weight is 12.40 grams for this date/series. That weight is far below any allowable tolerance and could only occur if the coin was worn completely slick (below PO1 even). Return it. It's not worth $30. Edited to correct nominal weight to 12.4 grams.Edited by BH1964
01/22/2016 9:31 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
@ Justinwd
Your PM is turned off. If you can get Silvertowne to give you a 50% refund (fat chance!), I'll glady buy it from you. I think it's cool. I've never seen one like this.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
311 Posts |
How do I turn the pm on? Silver town offered to buy it back for 25$, haven't decided if I'm gonna sell it yet, it's only 30$, and it's different but if do I'll give you first dibs tycoon. Although I don't think I'm allowed to sell until 250 posts.
Edited by Justinwd
01/23/2016 08:30 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36903 Posts |
This one has many red flags, the rims, edge reeding. It might be a contemporary counterfeit. Hard to tell from these photos.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,606 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 01/22/2016 3:42 pm
