| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,546 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
71 Posts |
Thanks for the input guys. I think I'll pass on the coins for now. My search continues
|
|
Valued Member
United States
311 Posts |
I'm in the Nashville area... you want me to go down and verify that coin for you? If not, tell me what shop and I'll jump on that deal.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
The '09-S looks about VF-25/30 to me, but I certainly don't like that obverse discoloration.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
im not exactly sure why but both of these scream fake to me.
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
784 Posts |
The 11s looks cleaned. Probably good to pass on these if you can't get them in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
both coins are cleaned. Too bad.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
71 Posts |
I tried to I'm you CJ. I cant because I'm still a noob. I'm not buying the coins
|
|
Valued Member
United States
311 Posts |
no problem, let me know if you need help later... I'll be driving through ATL in early April
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
912 Posts |
Sorry for the slow reply - both coins have a common reverse flaw found on early Chinese copy/counterfeits. It is most obvious on the 1911-s. Forum decorum prevents me form pointing out the exact die marker. If the coin(s) are still for sale, please provide the link so we can report them as counterfeit. For review of other other recent old Chinese copies check out Coin Community Posts: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1909-S-WHEA...?&rmvSB=truehttps://goccf.com/t/254576
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
912 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
784 Posts |
Jim,
Not trying to cause problems but what forum decorum prevents us from knowing what die marker makes a counterfeit? Why would they prevent us from learning? Just confused, and very curious to see what it is you see that makes these bad. Also, the url you posted about the UNC 1909-s, is it the same die marker there as well? Could you maybe PM me with the info so I can learn? Thanks!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19972 Posts |
Agree with Jim here. They both look to be counterfeit.
On the 09S the portrait is inconsistent with the rest of the obverse devices. An early die state is implied but the entire portrait is weak...illogical for this issue.
Also, I think the slightly angled pictures make it hard to see the proportions of things. I suspect the date/MM look off from an overhead view. Additionally, I don't like the rims and the surfaces are suspect.
When you see a coin like this, trust that very first feeling you get, in the first 3 seconds. If something seems off, then it probably is. This is why buying coins in-hand is FAR superior to the web - you can take a closer look! This 3 second rule I use has worked very well for me over the years. I would estimate it's only been wrong <10% of the time....a closer inspection confirmed.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
286 Posts |
Something isn't right with them.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
71 Posts |
Thanks Jim!! I agree we need to be able to post educational material. If I hadn't been apart of this forum I most likely would be sitting with two worthless coins in my hand and not knowing otherwise. Thanks guys your the best!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,546 |
Page 2 of 2
|